The Forge Forums Read-only Archives
The live Forge Forums
|
Articles
|
Reviews
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
March 05, 2014, 08:25:22 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes:
Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:
Advanced search
275647
Posts in
27717
Topics by
4283
Members Latest Member:
-
otto
Most online today:
56
- most online ever:
429
(November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
The Forge Archives
Archive
Indie Game Design
(Moderator:
Ron Edwards
)
[Mountain Witch] Probability and Damage
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Author
Topic: [Mountain Witch] Probability and Damage (Read 1020 times)
timfire
Member
Posts: 756
[Mountain Witch] Probability and Damage
«
on:
December 20, 2004, 09:52:04 PM »
I worked out some math for various dice probabilities for
The Mountain Witch
. You can check them out
[here]
.
Basic resolution is pretty predictable. What surprised me was damage. Currently, the rule is that damage can never reduce a roll below 1. I thought that damage would have a lopsided spread, meaning an increasingly high chance for worse and worse failure. (Basically the reverse of the Betraying probabilities.)
But it doesn't. Because the roll is capped at 1, what it does is flatten the distribution. With high damage, because the player is basically reduced to just rolling 1, his roll is basically voided. That means the opponent ends up having an equal (1/6) chance of rolling anything from a tie to a double success (kill).
The reason I made the capping rule was for aiding. I thought that it didn't make sense for an aiding roll to go negative and
hurt
the other player's roll. I also liked the effect it created in aiding: If the minimum of two rolls was 2, that meant that opponents could never gain a double success. That means, two characters trusting and aiding one another could
never
die (for as long as they still have trust)! They may get the crap beaten out of them, but they'll keep going. I like that.
But I'm not sure I like the probabilities of one wounded character fighting by themselves. What do y'all think? Should I remove the cap? If I did that, I could just say that when aiding, a negative roll just counts as zero.
I guess I could try to have it both ways. I could say that a lone character has no roll cap, but an aiding character alwasy gets at least 1. Does that sound contrived?
Or, do y'all think that the cap as it stands now is fine? The rules as they stand now actually make it pretty hard to kill a PC, which some might consider a good thing.
Thanks everyone!
Logged
--Timothy Walters Kleinert
daMoose_Neo
Member
Posts: 890
[Mountain Witch] Probability and Damage
«
Reply #1 on:
December 21, 2004, 08:26:27 AM »
Actually, that might work well.
Thematically, as long as you have someone watching your back, you're safer than not. So, that translates well mechanically. If you have a hand, your buddy helps you and you help him and both walk away with bumps and bruises but you DO walk away. Whereas when you're on your own, you could easily be in a lot more trouble, in over your head.
Logged
Nate Petersen / daMoose
Neo Productions Unlimited!
Publisher of Final Twilight card game, Imp Game RPG, and more titles to come!
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
=> Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
General Forge Forums
-----------------------------
=> First Thoughts
=> Playtesting
=> Endeavor
=> Actual Play
=> Publishing
=> Connections
=> Conventions
=> Site Discussion
-----------------------------
Archive
-----------------------------
=> RPG Theory
=> GNS Model Discussion
=> Indie Game Design
-----------------------------
Independent Game Forums
-----------------------------
=> Adept Press
=> Arkenstone Publishing
=> Beyond the Wire Productions
=> Black and Green Games
=> Bully Pulpit Games
=> Dark Omen Games
=> Dog Eared Designs
=> Eric J. Boyd Designs
=> Errant Knight Games
=> Galileo Games
=> glyphpress
=> Green Fairy Games
=> Half Meme Press
=> Incarnadine Press
=> lumpley games
=> Muse of Fire Games
=> ndp design
=> Night Sky Games
=> one.seven design
=> Robert Bohl Games
=> Stone Baby Games
=> These Are Our Games
=> Twisted Confessions
=> Universalis
=> Wild Hunt Studios
-----------------------------
Inactive Forums
-----------------------------
=> My Life With Master Playtest
=> Adamant Entertainment
=> Bob Goat Press
=> Burning Wheel
=> Cartoon Action Hour
=> Chimera Creative
=> CRN Games
=> Destroy All Games
=> Evilhat Productions
=> HeroQuest
=> Key 20 Publishing
=> Memento-Mori Theatricks
=> Mystic Ages Online
=> Orbit
=> Scattershot
=> Seraphim Guard
=> Wicked Press
=> Review Discussion
=> XIG Games
=> SimplePhrase Press
=> The Riddle of Steel
=> Random Order Creations
=> Forge Birthday Forum