*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 05, 2014, 08:25:22 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4283 Members Latest Member: - otto Most online today: 56 - most online ever: 429 (November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: [Mountain Witch] Probability and Damage  (Read 1020 times)
timfire
Member

Posts: 756


WWW
« on: December 20, 2004, 09:52:04 PM »

I worked out some math for various dice probabilities for The Mountain Witch. You can check them out [here].

Basic resolution is pretty predictable. What surprised me was damage. Currently, the rule is that damage can never reduce a roll below 1. I thought that damage would have a lopsided spread, meaning an increasingly high chance for worse and worse failure. (Basically the reverse of the Betraying probabilities.)

But it doesn't. Because the roll is capped at 1, what it does is flatten the distribution. With high damage, because the player is basically reduced to just rolling 1, his roll is basically voided. That means the opponent ends up having an equal (1/6) chance of rolling anything from a tie to a double success (kill).

The reason I made the capping rule was for aiding. I thought that it didn't make sense for an aiding roll to go negative and hurt the other player's roll. I also liked the effect it created in aiding: If the minimum of two rolls was 2, that meant that opponents could never gain a double success. That means, two characters trusting and aiding one another could never die (for as long as they still have trust)! They may get the crap beaten out of them, but they'll keep going. I like that.

But I'm not sure I like the probabilities of one wounded character fighting by themselves. What do y'all think? Should I remove the cap? If I did that, I could just say that when aiding, a negative roll just counts as zero.

I guess I could try to have it both ways. I could say that a lone character has no roll cap, but an aiding character alwasy gets at least 1. Does that sound contrived?

Or, do y'all think that the cap as it stands now is fine? The rules as they stand now actually make it pretty hard to kill a PC, which some might consider a good thing.

Thanks everyone!
Logged

--Timothy Walters Kleinert
daMoose_Neo
Member

Posts: 890


WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2004, 08:26:27 AM »

Actually, that might work well.
Thematically, as long as you have someone watching your back, you're safer than not. So, that translates well mechanically. If you have a hand, your buddy helps you and you help him and both walk away with bumps and bruises but you DO walk away. Whereas when you're on your own, you could easily be in a lot more trouble, in over your head.
Logged

Nate Petersen / daMoose
Neo Productions Unlimited! Publisher of Final Twilight card game, Imp Game RPG, and more titles to come!
Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!