*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 05, 2014, 11:35:23 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4283 Members Latest Member: - otto Most online today: 55 - most online ever: 429 (November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
Pages: 1 [2]
Print
Author Topic: Narrativists: Competitive Wusses?  (Read 3016 times)
Dav
Member

Posts: 432


WWW
« Reply #15 on: May 24, 2001, 09:58:00 AM »

Ron:

Point conceded.

But I still think I have a point.  For me, GNS is not as much in the mechanics, but more in the manner in which the players and GM utilize those mechanics to create the game.

Dav
Logged
Poxface
Member

Posts: 4


« Reply #16 on: May 24, 2001, 11:24:00 AM »

Logged
Ian O'Rourke
Member

Posts: 273


WWW
« Reply #17 on: May 25, 2001, 01:56:00 PM »

Quote

On 2001-05-24 13:58, Dav wrote:
Ron:

Point conceded.

But I still think I have a point.  For me, GNS is not as much in the mechanics, but more in the manner in which the players and GM utilize those mechanics to create the game.


But the use of GNS to see how players interact with the game strikes me to be like 'audience tests' for movies. Pointless.
Logged

Ian O'Rourke
www.fandomlife.net
The e-zine of SciFi media and Fandom Culture.
Mike Holmes
Acts of Evil Playtesters
Member

Posts: 10459


« Reply #18 on: May 29, 2001, 10:00:00 AM »

Disagree. Audience tests for movies may be irrelevant because theaudience does not interact with the movie. Unlike RPGs, where they will interact with the game. It is ultimately important to peoples enjoyment whether or not they will like or dislike the style that a particular game is played in. And to the extent that a system promotes a certain style it will therefore be more likely to be satisfactory to the players. You can force them to play a particular style, but that may alienate them and potentially makes for an awful game.

IMHO,
Mike Holmes
Logged

Member of Indie Netgaming
-Get your indie game fix online.
Doc Midnight
Member

Posts: 24


WWW
« Reply #19 on: June 14, 2001, 01:55:00 PM »

I do not compete in RPG's because most RPG's have a system by which XP's are earned. The award is pretty arbitrary. D&D has always rewarded you for killing in mass quantities or selling the crap you find.

Most modern games have award systems based on roleplay so why compete.

There is no fun in killing in mass quantities UNLESS the story is so good that it must be done.

I will compete in any other activity (athletic) I take part in.

I like method *N* because I do want some return for my investment. If I spend 3 hours of my life in character creation, I will get the most out of it.

Are there ways of competeing that I'm missing here?

Enlighten a brotha please.


Logged

Doc Midnight
www.terrygant.com
I'm not saying, I'm just saying.
Jared A. Sorensen
Member

Posts: 1463

Darksided


WWW
« Reply #20 on: June 14, 2001, 02:56:00 PM »

"Yo yo yo...wassup wassup, gimme the rock..."

Check out Pantheon & Other Games.  You win by having the most points.  You get points by being the last to die...or sometimes the first to do.  Or sometimes by doing or saying a specific thing during the game...

It's a lot of fun.  In the "Destroy All Buildings" game, I lost...big-time.  -54 points.  Yowch.


Logged

jared a. sorensen / www.memento-mori.com
Pages: 1 [2]
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!