*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 05, 2014, 11:45:20 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4283 Members Latest Member: - otto Most online today: 55 - most online ever: 429 (November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: Only one conflict per scene?  (Read 1282 times)
Sindyr
Member

Posts: 795


« on: April 30, 2006, 09:14:37 AM »

I know that sometimes Scenes can occur with no conflicts - do they ever occur with 2 or more conflicts?

What is the signal that a scene is over and that a new one is to be framed?
Logged

-Sindyr
Matt Wilson
Moderator
Member
*
Posts: 1121

student, second edition


WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 30, 2006, 09:51:28 AM »

Check out the bit called "When is a Scene Over?" It's right after the conflict section, and it should answer your questions.

If you have a scene with a conflict and then believe that the scene still hasn't addressed the focus or agenda, then probably the conflict wasn't about the right stuff.
Logged

Sindyr
Member

Posts: 795


« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2006, 10:04:37 AM »

So when the conflict is made, it must be made such that the resolution of the conflict naturally ends the scene by resolving the Agenda?

Or vice versa, the resolver/narrator of the conflict must include in his narration the resolution of the scene as well?

Either way, it sounds like you are saying that two conflicts in a scene means that something is not being done right.
Logged

-Sindyr
Glendower
Member

Posts: 182

My name is Jon.


« Reply #3 on: May 03, 2006, 07:07:43 AM »

So when the conflict is made, it must be made such that the resolution of the conflict naturally ends the scene by resolving the Agenda?

Or vice versa, the resolver/narrator of the conflict must include in his narration the resolution of the scene as well?

Either way, it sounds like you are saying that two conflicts in a scene means that something is not being done right.

One Scene, one conflict feels pretty right in my mind.  The show I've been directing usually only needs one conflict to get everyone's stakes for the scene out in the open (and these stakes can get pretty diverse!) and usually satisfies the Agenda of the scene, whatever it may be.  I think the key is to make sure that the Agenda being set is very clear and concrete, giving all the protagonists in scene a very strong goal when interacting and stakes setting. 

Agenda + Issue usually = nice juicy conflict.

As for a conflict ending the scene, this happens most of the time.  But a few times there's about 15 -20 minutes of protagonists dealing with the consequences of the conflict at the tail end of the scene.

From what I've read, no where does it say One scene, one conflict.  It's one scene, one AGENDA.  Conflict is simply a means to satisfy the agenda to the scene framer's satisfaction.  If you find you need another conflict, It won't break the game to have another conflict.  The thing is, second conflicts normally just don't normally come up in a single scene.
Logged

Hi, my name is Jon.
Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!