*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 05, 2014, 10:37:50 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4283 Members Latest Member: - otto Most online today: 55 - most online ever: 429 (November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: The danger of Maximum Game Fun  (Read 1165 times)
Web_Weaver
Member

Posts: 215


WWW
« on: May 14, 2006, 03:21:14 PM »


I considered throwing this straight into the toolbox thread, but think it may require some discussion.

I believe there is an inherent danger in the "Maximum Game Fun" maxim, as expressed in HeroQuest. The description of this in the rules (p190) is fine, but it can lead to potential problems.

I have seen this maxim used in a dysfunctional way, when it masks an unclear or distorted agenda.

The key is Maximum Game Fun is not to be confused with Maximum Narrator Fun. If the narrator has a preconceived ideal that is not stated (or stated unclearly) he can make assumptions about what fun is. This is especially prevalent in Simulationist play, which is an agenda that can go unrecognised as it has narrative aspects and often goes hand in hand with Gamism.

But to avoid the whole GNS learning curve here are some possibilities:

Situation: The narrator that is trying to recreate a novel or genre and thinks that everyone is on board because they all agree with that premise.
Pitfall: If the players diverge from the vision, the narrator may attempt to force the players back into line by holding up the novel or genre as an example of fun story. "It's more fun if we deal with the moral considerations here, just like in <insert moral driven novel here>. So maybe you wouldn't just kill them."

Situation: A narrator is concerned with realism of background and an authentic world.
Pitfall: The narrator halts play in the middle of extended contests to adjust his bad guys because they shouldn't be so easy to beat. This can ignore any fun that gamists may be having in favour of the "fun" of authenticity. "Bigger Challenges are fun right?"

Situation: Narrator is concerned with a preconceived plot that the players are unaware of.
Pitfall: The narrator may overtly railroad without any guilt. "Trust me, you will have more fun fighting than running away."


So my suggestion is, always check that your idea of fun is compatible with your players. You may be surprised.

Any ideas of a clearer way to state this?
Any actual examples that you have had playing HeroQuest?
Can we arrive at a better definition of Maximum Game Fun than the one in the rules?
Logged

Mike Holmes
Acts of Evil Playtesters
Member

Posts: 10459


« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2006, 11:36:16 AM »

I've basically come to the same conclusion here: http://www.indie-rpgs.com/forum/index.php?topic=14144.0

As long as MGF is synonymous with YGMV, I find it innoccuous. As soon as people start thinking it means, "Ignore the rules at whim during play, if they're getting in your way" that's when I have problems with it.

Mike
Logged

Member of Indie Netgaming
-Get your indie game fix online.
Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!