*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 05, 2014, 06:36:44 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4283 Members Latest Member: - otto Most online today: 55 - most online ever: 429 (November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: solution for the "War Shoal" problem...?  (Read 732 times)
jackson_tegu
Member

Posts: 12

what a delight / the internet, tonight.


« on: February 10, 2007, 04:33:35 PM »

Logged

sure of ourselves, aren't we?
Eero Tuovinen
Acts of Evil Playtesters
Member

Posts: 2591


WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2007, 08:26:03 AM »

What I'd use for a checkers-like board would simply be a piece of paper with the coordinates of the stealth piece. Simple enough. The player who knows where the piece is can then tell the other player if and when the piece interacts in some manner. This doesn't of course eliminate double blinds where there needs to be interaction between stealth pieces of opposite sides. In other words, the piece of paper method (as well as the separate boards and such) only work for when no such interaction is necessary.

Also, check out Kriegspiel; I imagine that if there are elegant solutions to the double blind situation, they'd have appeared in some form in that community.
Logged

Blogging at Game Design is about Structure.
Publishing Zombie Cinema and Solar System at Arkenstone Publishing.
Callan S.
Member

Posts: 3588


WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2007, 04:03:31 PM »

Hi Jackson, welcome to the forge!

Logged

Philosopher Gamer
<meaning></meaning>
jackson_tegu
Member

Posts: 12

what a delight / the internet, tonight.


« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2007, 10:34:32 AM »

Logged

sure of ourselves, aren't we?
contracycle
Member

Posts: 2807


« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2007, 04:35:22 AM »

You could also totaslly abstract stealth off the board.  Then, any in game action that succesfully refers to stealth is used as the rational to put a new counter no the board, anywhere.  Or, in limited bands or zones.

Frex, at the start of the game I indicate that I devote resources to three submarines.  Three times in the coming game I will be able to declare a surprise submarine attack.  However, I can only deploy a submarine that is as many rows away from my edge of the board as there are turns of the game already played.  This means that striking at the rear still takes turn time.

This could be a two-edged sword, in that the ambiguity of the subs position can be collapsed the other way.  In defending against subs I deploy some sort of cruiser say, and if I succeed at some "sub detection" task, I then nominate one of my cruisers as the detector, and the owner of the sub MUST deploy at least 1 hitherto hidden sub within 1 square of my cruiser.  This way an enemy sub gets forcibly dragged into a trap from its nebulous state of non-being.
Logged

Impeach the bomber boys:
www.impeachblair.org
www.impeachbush.org

"He who loves practice without theory is like the sailor who boards ship without a rudder and compass and never knows where he may cast."
- Leonardo da Vinci
jackson_tegu
Member

Posts: 12

what a delight / the internet, tonight.


« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2007, 04:31:35 PM »

omg that is really spectactular. i have like the biggest smile on my face right now. i have to rush off, but, without irony, that is a totally great idea which creates all sorts of other tangental ideas...
thank you contracycle!
Logged

sure of ourselves, aren't we?
johnwedd
Member

Posts: 32


WWW
« Reply #6 on: February 15, 2007, 07:22:16 AM »

i do the same thing, go in a frenzy of write for about three hours then a shiny object tosses me off.
Logged

Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!