*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 05, 2014, 05:22:26 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4283 Members Latest Member: - otto Most online today: 55 - most online ever: 429 (November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: [Daker] Eating people is bad  (Read 829 times)
GB Steve
Member

Posts: 429


WWW
« on: June 10, 2007, 02:07:36 PM »

My French friend Ben was in town for a night so we assembled some likely faces for a game. Graham W kindly offered to give us a run of Darker, his English Roach vairiant.

Ben gives his view of the proceedings here
Logged
Jason Morningstar
Member

Posts: 1428


WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2007, 03:37:21 PM »

It's good to hear that the slightly more focused setting of Darker pays off.

Cold comfort now, but there's a character sheet available (just) that lists events, Darker notables, and so forth.
Logged

Graham W
Member

Posts: 437


WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2007, 04:42:55 AM »

Thanks, Steve, it was a very pleasant evening.

It took a while for everyone to warm up, I think: at first, I thought it wasn't going to go well. I explained the rules very badly, forgetting to mention NPCs being incorporated into scenes. I'm glad people enjoyed it: honestly, I wasn't sure whether they had or not.

Ben's right to say there wasn't much horror, as such. It was more epic stuff, with armies of choirboys and huge Victorian war machines. I was very glad when you burnt down the slums.

The more specific Events and Enthusiasms worked well, I thought.

It was very useful, too. I made some changes to the text after playing...

1. The original instructions, on Enthusiasms, were: choose one Enthusiasm from the original Shab al-Hiri Roach rules, plus one of the new Victorian Enthusiasms. On a hunch, I changed that for our game, so that everyone had two Victorian Enthusiasms, and the original Enthusiasms weren't used. It worked fine, so that's now the rule.

2. When I read out the Little Girls Enthusiasm, I was rather embarrassed by the reaction. Man, everyone thinks it's about paedophilia, straight away, even though I make it clear it's not. So...with regret...I've changed Little Girls to Children. Same Enthusiasm, basically, but now it's boys and girls. It has the advantage that it includes the whole Scouting movement, which is very Victorian. Still, I didn't really want to do it.

3. Also, when I read out Women's Rights, I was embarrassed to read out one sentence, with women present (the original text said "...you wouldn't deny a husband's rights over his wife", which was a bit much and I'm slightly embarrassed about). I've toned it down to "...and women shouldn't worry their pretty heads about voting!", which is, um, offensive in a less offensive way.

Thanks again.

Jason, shall we put this on the back cover?

Quote
I was ordered to eat until bursting when Roached, so undertook to swallow a little girl whole: shoes, socks and alice band. I also set fire to the poor.

Graham
Logged
Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!