The Forge Forums Read-only Archives
The live Forge Forums
|
Articles
|
Reviews
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
March 05, 2014, 02:30:43 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes:
Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:
Advanced search
275647
Posts in
27717
Topics by
4283
Members Latest Member:
-
otto
Most online today:
55
- most online ever:
429
(November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
The Forge Archives
Independent Game Forums
lumpley games
(Moderator:
lumpley
)
[IaWA] describing injury and exhaustion
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Author
Topic: [IaWA] describing injury and exhaustion (Read 1433 times)
jenskot
Member
Posts: 54
[IaWA] describing injury and exhaustion
«
on:
May 02, 2008, 05:40:40 AM »
Who describes the effects of injury and exhaustion?
Is it:
- the Challenger
- the Answerer
- the person who took the damage
- the person who dealt the damage
- the person who chose damage over negotiation
- the person who wanted negotiation but the other person chose damage
I believe this is another factor that once clarified will greatly improve our play. In play, since no one was sure who has authority over describing how someone was injured or exhausted, the descriptions were fairly weak as no one wanted to make strong statements out of uncertainty or fear of stepping on anyone toes. I believe once it is clear who has final authority over the color of being injured or exhausted, it could add a great deal of tension and fear of taking damage as it will no longer be a numerical effect but rather, "what do you mean you rip my ears off... fuck that, take the god damn ring!"
Hahahahaha.
Rock,
John
Logged
nerdnyc.com
lumpley
Administrator
Member
Posts: 3453
Re: [IaWA] describing injury and exhaustion
«
Reply #1 on:
May 02, 2008, 06:58:30 AM »
Generally, the person who dealt the damage and the GM together.
Strictly speaking, anybody can.
However, the GM, as overseer general, is responsible for making sure that injury descriptions are bloody and bone-crunching enough, and exhaustion descriptions are grueling enough. As GM, you should a) make sure that the person who dealt the damage has full input, even if someone else does the actual describing, then b) make sure that someone actually does describe it, and c) whoever that is, provoke them to details until they've described something genuinely injuring or exhausting.
This is basically just the description rule! When you're called upon to describe something, do (in this case, that means don't fall short of it), and say what's obvious to you plus a detail.
-Vincent
Logged
jenskot
Member
Posts: 54
Re: [IaWA] describing injury and exhaustion
«
Reply #2 on:
May 02, 2008, 11:43:51 AM »
Awesome!
I think the winner controlling the color details of damage (with GM overseeing) and the Answerer controlling the color details of advantage and circumstance can definitely lead to tense negotiations.
Continuing my thought process from here...
- Challenger: wins final action roll.
- Answerer: "I run away with the ring but you catch up to me and kick the crap out of me."
- Challenger: "give me the fucking ring [negotiation] or I'll rip your ears off [injure]."
- Answerer: "but the ring means everything to me..."
- Challenger: "great, I start ripping your ears off... how does that feel fucker???"
- Answerer: "aHHHhhhRRRrrr, take the damn ring!!!!!!!"
Rock,
John
Logged
nerdnyc.com
lumpley
Administrator
Member
Posts: 3453
Re: [IaWA] describing injury and exhaustion
«
Reply #3 on:
May 02, 2008, 02:09:33 PM »
YES.
I probably should have used this word in the text: permanently. The winner can
permanently
exhaust or
permanently
injure the loser. Chop off his hand, tear off his ear, break his heart, break his will. Describe it.
-Vincent
Logged
jenskot
Member
Posts: 54
Re: [IaWA] describing injury and exhaustion
«
Reply #4 on:
May 02, 2008, 02:58:18 PM »
For me, that changes... EVERYTHING!
Me = excited!
Logged
nerdnyc.com
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
=> Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
General Forge Forums
-----------------------------
=> First Thoughts
=> Playtesting
=> Endeavor
=> Actual Play
=> Publishing
=> Connections
=> Conventions
=> Site Discussion
-----------------------------
Archive
-----------------------------
=> RPG Theory
=> GNS Model Discussion
=> Indie Game Design
-----------------------------
Independent Game Forums
-----------------------------
=> Adept Press
=> Arkenstone Publishing
=> Beyond the Wire Productions
=> Black and Green Games
=> Bully Pulpit Games
=> Dark Omen Games
=> Dog Eared Designs
=> Eric J. Boyd Designs
=> Errant Knight Games
=> Galileo Games
=> glyphpress
=> Green Fairy Games
=> Half Meme Press
=> Incarnadine Press
=> lumpley games
=> Muse of Fire Games
=> ndp design
=> Night Sky Games
=> one.seven design
=> Robert Bohl Games
=> Stone Baby Games
=> These Are Our Games
=> Twisted Confessions
=> Universalis
=> Wild Hunt Studios
-----------------------------
Inactive Forums
-----------------------------
=> My Life With Master Playtest
=> Adamant Entertainment
=> Bob Goat Press
=> Burning Wheel
=> Cartoon Action Hour
=> Chimera Creative
=> CRN Games
=> Destroy All Games
=> Evilhat Productions
=> HeroQuest
=> Key 20 Publishing
=> Memento-Mori Theatricks
=> Mystic Ages Online
=> Orbit
=> Scattershot
=> Seraphim Guard
=> Wicked Press
=> Review Discussion
=> XIG Games
=> SimplePhrase Press
=> The Riddle of Steel
=> Random Order Creations
=> Forge Birthday Forum