The Forge Forums Read-only Archives
The live Forge Forums
|
Articles
|
Reviews
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
March 05, 2014, 01:13:50 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes:
Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:
Advanced search
275647
Posts in
27717
Topics by
4283
Members Latest Member:
-
otto
Most online today:
55
- most online ever:
429
(November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
The Forge Archives
Independent Game Forums
Adept Press
(Moderator:
Ron Edwards
)
[Sorcerer] Contacting/Total Failure - I must have missed a rule somewhere
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Author
Topic: [Sorcerer] Contacting/Total Failure - I must have missed a rule somewhere (Read 1400 times)
pygstasis
Registree
Posts: 2
[Sorcerer] Contacting/Total Failure - I must have missed a rule somewhere
«
on:
May 15, 2008, 03:23:29 PM »
In Sorcerer, on page 86, the rules for Contacting with the help of hallucinogens state "the sorcerer must roll his will vs dice equal to the number of hits dropped. Failure means that his will is impaired by one for several weeks; total failure ( no victories) means that the loss is permanent." What I don't understand is what is the difference between failure and total failure? As I understand it, *any* victories rolled would mean the roll was a success. Help in clearing up my confusion will be much appreciated!
Logged
Marshall Burns
Member
Posts: 485
Re: [Sorcerer] Contacting/Total Failure - I must have missed a rule somewhere
«
Reply #1 on:
May 15, 2008, 03:46:31 PM »
I think that if the drugs get a Total Victory, that means you got a Total Failure.
-Marshall
Logged
blogging at the Wizard Exploded Cookbook
pygstasis
Registree
Posts: 2
Re: [Sorcerer] Contacting/Total Failure - I must have missed a rule somewhere
«
Reply #2 on:
May 15, 2008, 03:51:18 PM »
Doh! That seems so clear now. Thanks for the quick reply!
Logged
Ron Edwards
Global Moderator
Member
Posts: 16490
Re: [Sorcerer] Contacting/Total Failure - I must have missed a rule somewhere
«
Reply #3 on:
May 15, 2008, 04:32:34 PM »
Yeah, that's a bit of inadvertent terminology - I was too quick to assign a Capitalized Importance to that outcome. I would have done better to write, "If the values of all of the player's dice are under all the values of the opposing dice," or something like that.
Best, Ron
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
=> Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
General Forge Forums
-----------------------------
=> First Thoughts
=> Playtesting
=> Endeavor
=> Actual Play
=> Publishing
=> Connections
=> Conventions
=> Site Discussion
-----------------------------
Archive
-----------------------------
=> RPG Theory
=> GNS Model Discussion
=> Indie Game Design
-----------------------------
Independent Game Forums
-----------------------------
=> Adept Press
=> Arkenstone Publishing
=> Beyond the Wire Productions
=> Black and Green Games
=> Bully Pulpit Games
=> Dark Omen Games
=> Dog Eared Designs
=> Eric J. Boyd Designs
=> Errant Knight Games
=> Galileo Games
=> glyphpress
=> Green Fairy Games
=> Half Meme Press
=> Incarnadine Press
=> lumpley games
=> Muse of Fire Games
=> ndp design
=> Night Sky Games
=> one.seven design
=> Robert Bohl Games
=> Stone Baby Games
=> These Are Our Games
=> Twisted Confessions
=> Universalis
=> Wild Hunt Studios
-----------------------------
Inactive Forums
-----------------------------
=> My Life With Master Playtest
=> Adamant Entertainment
=> Bob Goat Press
=> Burning Wheel
=> Cartoon Action Hour
=> Chimera Creative
=> CRN Games
=> Destroy All Games
=> Evilhat Productions
=> HeroQuest
=> Key 20 Publishing
=> Memento-Mori Theatricks
=> Mystic Ages Online
=> Orbit
=> Scattershot
=> Seraphim Guard
=> Wicked Press
=> Review Discussion
=> XIG Games
=> SimplePhrase Press
=> The Riddle of Steel
=> Random Order Creations
=> Forge Birthday Forum