*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 05, 2014, 05:18:25 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4283 Members Latest Member: - otto Most online today: 55 - most online ever: 429 (November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: [Mask of the Emperor] Spending honor makes you look dishonorable  (Read 311 times)
Abkajud
Member

Posts: 188


« on: February 20, 2009, 04:59:44 PM »

First real playtest session last night; good times. I posted about it over in Playtesting, go figure Smiley
One of the things that occurred to me was that Aloof and Dishonorable characters aren't even close to having their honor-status be "up for grabs" the way an Honorable character's is. I'm concerned that, thus far, I might be "97%-ing" (a term I heard somewhere to describe when pre-play events *almost* finish the character's take on the Premise, nearly leaving it fixed and static before play even begins) with these character types.

So a thought occurred to me - I was already going to let Honorable characters spend temporary Honor points (up to their permanent Honor rating) to gain extra dice on dice pools, at a rate of 1 Honor=2 extra dice. The catch is this: when you do so, you're abusing your own good reputation to pull a fast one on others, and so the post-dice-roll narration of the action should/must be reprehensible, grossly inappropriate, or suchlike.
Permanent Honor adds to dice pools in front of a receptive Audience of NPCs, which gives Honorable characters both an edge and something that can be risked. On the other hand, since anybody can gain temporary Honor through the end-of-session honor vote, I'd say that this gives Aloof and Honorable characters something to risk, too.

Does this seem counterintuitive? In story-plot terms, you're wrecking the reputation you've built up in a sudden impulsive act; in game-mechanic terms, a character with nothing to lose has nothing to gain, essentially, but if you build something up, you can smash it apart for a quick boost of agency.

I suppose this means that if a player steadfastly and consistently refuses temporary Honor, but the other players want to reward him for at least making it look like he follows protocol, then he should earn it; a character who'd make the Emperor proud would get that Honor, plain and simple, even if those dice stand for everything the character's against. It's perceived virtue and goodwill, and as such lacks substance beneath the surface. A character who goes out of his way to be rude, disturbing, and discomfiting towards the nobility and the Godlike Emperor, but who was still quite useful, might be provided for by the throne financially and in other rewards, but not actually given any accolades. You can be a hero that the Emperor won't really acknowledge, if you truly want to play it that way, I suppose Smiley

Since my two PCs are Aloof and Dishonorable respectively, I think I'll start up with the Honor vote next time around, and see where it goes. Maybe the Dishonorable noblewoman-turned-pickpocket will make a point of squandering what little rep she can gain for herself, just to flip off the establishment. That'd address Premise pretty well, I think!
Logged

Mask of the Emperor rules, admittedly a work in progress - http://abbysgamerbasement.blogspot.com/
Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!