*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 05, 2014, 12:02:05 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4283 Members Latest Member: - otto Most online today: 55 - most online ever: 429 (November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: D6 instead of D10?  (Read 3716 times)
quozl
Member

Posts: 534


WWW
« on: December 30, 2002, 08:48:05 AM »

First, I've read the book but haven't played it yet.  I wonder if 6-sided dice can be used instead of 10-siders.  If so, what adjustments would need to be made?

I just don't have that many 10-siders laying around....
Logged

--- Jonathan N.
Currently playtesting Frankenstein's Monsters
rafial
Member

Posts: 594


WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2002, 04:03:57 PM »

Say successes are 1-3, and then have the winner get double coins back.  That is, if the winner rolled (1 5 3 4 6 6 2), that would be 3 successes, the sum of the success dice would be 1 + 3 + 2 = 6, so the winner gets 12 coins.

The payoffs under this scheme should be slightly higher than if you were using d10s, but not badly so...  Or you might try paying off winners according to the schedule:

d6 result
1 = 1 coin
2 = 3 coins
3 = 5 coins

Which should be pretty spot on.  Under this scheme the winner in the example above would get 9 coins.
Logged
quozl
Member

Posts: 534


WWW
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2002, 06:53:08 PM »

Quote from: rafial
Or you might try paying off winners according to the schedule:

d6 result
1 = 1 coin
2 = 3 coins
3 = 5 coins


Hmm...maybe we could just say odd numbers are successes, then all you would get are 1's, 3's and 5's.  Would that work?
Logged

--- Jonathan N.
Currently playtesting Frankenstein's Monsters
rafial
Member

Posts: 594


WWW
« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2002, 07:49:25 PM »

Quote from: quozl
Hmm...maybe we could just say odd numbers are successes, then all you would get are 1's, 3's and 5's.  Would that work?


Yes indeed, the simple elegance of that approach is astounding.
Logged
Mike Holmes
Moderator
Member
*
Posts: 10459


« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2002, 01:33:53 PM »

Nifty. This should go right up next to the add-on about using Coins. Excellent work.

Mike
Logged

Member of Indie Netgaming
-Get your indie game fix online.
Paganini
Member

Posts: 1049


WWW
« Reply #5 on: January 01, 2003, 06:32:30 AM »

Quote from: Mike Holmes
Nifty. This should go right up next to the add-on about using Coins. Excellent work.


I'm lost... was that sarcasm, Mike, or did I miss something?

If it's not sarcasm, why didn't you already know about it? It's what you do in Synthesis, and it's basically what we were doing in the IRC games.
Logged

Bob McNamee
Member

Posts: 685


« Reply #6 on: January 01, 2003, 09:07:18 AM »

Nathan,

I think the main point is that by using this method with d6's it keeps both the chance of success, and the range of Coin gain per success that using d10's do.

As a Champions GM with way more d6's than d10's I may end up switching to this method myself. If I find Complication die amounts going up too high.
Logged

Bob McNamee
Indie-netgaming- Out of the ordinary on-line gaming!
Valamir
Moderator
Member
*
Posts: 5574


WWW
« Reply #7 on: January 02, 2003, 06:21:01 PM »

Quote from: rafial
Quote from: quozl
Hmm...maybe we could just say odd numbers are successes, then all you would get are 1's, 3's and 5's.  Would that work?


Yes indeed, the simple elegance of that approach is astounding.


I agree.  This will definitely go up with the next update.
Logged

Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!