*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 05, 2014, 11:34:21 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4283 Members Latest Member: - otto Most online today: 55 - most online ever: 429 (November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: Player Authorial Stance, N & S  (Read 855 times)
Emily Care
Member

Posts: 1126


WWW
« on: August 24, 2001, 08:41:00 AM »

This is a direct quote from the Simulationist Players section of the GNS FAQ:

>...the player is "inside" the character and >has complete and utter authority
>over "my guy" and what he does. The GM, by >contrast, has complete and utter authority
>over anything external to the PCs. Author >stance is often frowned upon, both during >play and in the game texts; Director stance >is unheard of.

It seems like this would only be true for simulationist players who were also committed to solely deeply immersive play.  

Simulationist play can also be extremely supportive of greater player authorial stance and narrative sharing.  

In the FAQ, narrativism is strongly associated with player authorial stance and simulationism is strongly disassociated. It seems to me that certain flavors of N and S are being used to exemplify the whole gamut.

Thoughts on this issue?
Logged

Koti ei ole koti ilman saunaa.

Black & Green Games
Gordon C. Landis
Member

Posts: 1024

I am Custom-Built Games


WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2001, 10:15:00 AM »

This is an excellent point.  Seems that a number of Simulationist-related threads right after the FAQ was posted touched on this.  My main thought is . . . we need a look at the revised FAQ before taking this too far.  I expect there'll be a lot of changes/clarifications.

Gordon C. Landis
Logged

www.snap-game.com (under construction)
Ron Edwards
Global Moderator
Member
*
Posts: 16490


WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2001, 11:07:00 AM »

And I cannot count the number of times I have stated:

"Stance is flexible. Players shift stance all the time during a session of play, often without thinking much about it. Although we OBSERVE Author/Director stance to be more common in Narrativist and Gamist play, and for mechanics supporting these stances to be found in combinations that support overall Narrativist or Gamist goals ... and although we OBSERVE the converse regarding Actor stance and Simulationist game design ... these are rough correlations and not 1:1 correspondences."

To repeat: stance shifts. It shifts within any style of play. The associations we observe (e.g. Actor being common in some forms of Simulationism) are not definitive, although they may be causal.

Best,
Ron
Logged
Mike Holmes
Acts of Evil Playtesters
Member

Posts: 10459


« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2001, 01:12:00 PM »

Hi Emily,

I have been an advocate recently for looking more closely at the concept of the use of authorial and directorial power in Simulationist games. I personally find some very fertile ground there. In fact I'm currently involved with a project that has a bit of this concept worked into it, and I'm very excited about it.

Yes, by definition, the "deep immersionists" eschew all but the actor stance. But as you point out, this is a small subset of the complete Simulationist set of methods.

Mike Holmes
Logged

Member of Indie Netgaming
-Get your indie game fix online.
Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!