*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
October 31, 2014, 04:11:36 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4283 Members Latest Member: - otto Most online today: 71 - most online ever: 429 (November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
Pages: [1] 2
Print
Author Topic: More on SOAP!  (Read 7665 times)
Tor Erickson
Member

Posts: 134


« on: September 14, 2001, 08:28:00 AM »

  I just read Ron's review of SOAP, then went and read the game itself.  Now I think I need to run it very soon, but I have a few questions that neither the review nor the game answers.
  What if you had more players than the game suggests (3 in the example)?  I'm thinking of five players, but if you stick to the 30 minute limit each player only ends up with 6 minutes of play time.  Is that enough? How many players did you run it with, Ron?
  Also, what constitutes giving a hint to your secret?  Does this just end up being GM's call or are there any guidelines to this?
  As a final note, I think I "got" the game while I was reading the example.  Specifically, the sentence where Sylvia (2 minutes into the game) says "Humming along to the tune of Aerosmith's Crazy, Michael accidentally runs a red light and ploughs into a cement truck."
  I'm still chuckling over that one,
Tor
Logged
jburneko
Member

Posts: 1351


« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2001, 08:49:00 AM »

Quote

On 2001-09-14 12:28, Tor Erickson wrote:
  What if you had more players than the game suggests (3 in the example)?  I'm thinking of five players, but if you stick to the 30 minute limit each player only ends up with 6 minutes of play time.  Is that enough? How many players did you run it with, Ron?
  Also, what constitutes giving a hint to your secret?  Does this just end up being GM's call or are there any guidelines to this?


Hello,

I've never played SOAP but I've read it over more than once.  Personally I don't see anything wrong with extending the time limit to an hour.  The author states that the half hour time limit is to mimic the average length of a soap opera episode but honestly I know of no soap opera that runs less than an hour.

On the secret thing, I think it's an honor system.  If you notice SOAP doesn't have a GM.  I think the idea is that if you feel you've given a significant hint about your secret take five tokens.  Just be honest.

Jesse
Logged
Ron Edwards
Global Moderator
Member
*
Posts: 16490


WWW
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2001, 08:55:00 AM »

Hey,

We had a Soap game at GenCon with something like nine people, and it was certainly limited in screen time per person, but fun nonetheless. We used the option that "once the half-hour is up, wrap it up." Probably ended up as an hour that way (anyone remember differently?).

As for the Hint issue, my rule of thumb is that a Hint should be enough to prompt a guess. So say it's the end of my turn - I claim I've provided a Hint and am ready to take my 5 tokens. If someone in the group is willing to guess SOMETHING, based on whatever information I've provided during my turn, that that's OK. If everyone says, "No, I can't guess anything that really interests me," then it's not.

If this very mechanic becomes ITSELF a power-issue, then you have dysfunction going on ... as I've said before, part of the solution is to specify that "secret" is what the CHARACTER calls it, but that the player really ought to think of it as "inevitable revelation."

Best,
Ron
Logged
Tor Erickson
Member

Posts: 134


« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2001, 09:56:00 AM »

 Oops.  Missed that part that there's no GM.  That puts a whole new take on the shebang, don't it?
  Honing in on the hint issue, let's say my character's secret is that she miscarried the baby of her husband's partner at work.  During the round, two of my sentences are, "Elizabeth calls David (the co-worker) and tearfully tries to get through to him" and "Even when she identifies herself and claims that it is urgent, however, his secretary claims that he is 'Taking no calls'."
  At the end of the round I say, "Gimmee five tokens, I dropped a fatty hint."
  NOW, is it enough for everybody playing to internally think, "Hmm, yes, there was a serious hint dropped there" and give the go ahead on the tokens, or do all the other players actually guess out loud what the secret is?  Big difference.  Which way did you play, Ron?
-Tor
Logged
Ron Edwards
Global Moderator
Member
*
Posts: 16490


WWW
« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2001, 10:26:00 AM »

T,

Going by the rules, Player A guesses at the end of Player A's own turn.

So say it's Player D's turn, and he provides a hint (so he says) and takes the tokens because at least one other player (say Player A) confirms that he was intrigued enough by the Hint to be harboring a guess. Player A does not guess at this time. Player D takes the tokens, and play moves from D on to player E. Eventually, some time, play moves to Player A, who takes his turn. At the end of his turn, Player A then guesses about Player D.

Qualifiers:
- Player A, at the end of his turn, can guess about any other player-character, not just D. Saying he had a guess in mind at the end of Player D's turn was not a commitment to guess.
- Player D, after taking his tokens, and before play moves on to Player E, of course gets HIS chance to guess about anyone.
- Any Player, at the end of his turn, can guess about Player D (or anyone else) without having confirmed that they were intending to.

Best,
Ron

P.S. Ferry, if I've screwed this up somehow, chime in and let me know.

[ This Message was edited by: Ron Edwards on 2001-09-14 14:27 ]
Logged
james_west
Member

Posts: 292


WWW
« Reply #5 on: September 14, 2001, 11:30:00 AM »

There were six people for the two sessions of it I've played, and it worked great. However, ours were more like an hour and a little long, each.

Pretty much, three hints should be all it's possible to give without giving it away; in this I tally well with Ron's experience.

Logged
Ron Edwards
Global Moderator
Member
*
Posts: 16490


WWW
« Reply #6 on: September 14, 2001, 11:39:00 AM »

Tor,

Again, speaking as a college prof, I have another suggestion.

Play Soap with some friends (who have NOTHING to do with the class) over the weekend. Don't go into the actual class session with an "I'm pretty sure it works this way" approach. Best to get the stumbles and rules clarifications down first.

This is exactly the same reason why, in a few minutes, I am going to blenderize a sandwich with some TAs to make sure that they have SEEN and DONE what they are going to be instructing next week (assessing for presence of macromolecules).

Best,
Ron
Logged
Tor Erickson
Member

Posts: 134


« Reply #7 on: September 14, 2001, 08:59:00 PM »

Thanks for the advice, fellas.  And yeah, I'm planning on trying to get a game going this weekend, I'll fill you on how it goes.
-T.
Logged
Tor Erickson
Member

Posts: 134


« Reply #8 on: September 16, 2001, 09:15:00 PM »

Logged
Ferry Bazelmans
Member

Posts: 137


WWW
« Reply #9 on: September 17, 2001, 12:52:00 AM »

Hi Tor,

A few words from the author (who is very sorry for not chiming in sooner)...

Quote
Logged

The BlackLight Bar, home of Soap: the game of soap opera mayhem.
Now available as a $2.95 Adobe PDF (Paypal only)
Ron Edwards
Global Moderator
Member
*
Posts: 16490


WWW
« Reply #10 on: September 17, 2001, 05:36:00 AM »

Crayne,

Thanks!

Tor,

"The one character who had his secret revealed was essentially out of the game at that point. He died the next round, but even if he hadn't the character had lost a certain mystique and was no longer very central to the wheeling and dealing that the rest of us were doing."

One thing to emphasize to players, when the time comes, is that a character being dead or "out" (in the sense you describe) does NOT mean that the player is out of the game. Granted, it's more fun to last all the way through, or to buy it big in the last scene, but it's perfectly OK to lose the PC relatively early and still be an active player, using "NPCs" and bidding and so on.

Best,
Ron
Logged
Tor Erickson
Member

Posts: 134


« Reply #11 on: September 17, 2001, 07:15:00 AM »

Hi Crayne,
  Thanks for your comments. I think it's amazing that I can play a game one night, and get comments from the game's designer by the next morning.  It kind of blows all other models of product support out of the water, doesn't it?
  The idea that when it's time for your sentence you have complete directorial control (within the limits of bidding etc), up to and including having other characters do and say whatever you want, is one I plan to exploit greatly when we play tonight.
  Also the point that anybody can counterbid is a good one: I imagine that it will keep everybody involved in the game.
  The other question I had, though, which I might not have expressed clearly in the post, was that we had trouble deciding what to do with guesses that were only partially correct. Give partial credit?  Say close enough and give it to them?  Make them guess it to the letter?
  Man, I'm already getting pumped up to play again tonight... :smile:
-Tor
Logged
Tor Erickson
Member

Posts: 134


« Reply #12 on: September 17, 2001, 07:22:00 AM »

Hello Ron,
Quote

On 2001-09-17 09:36, Ron Edwards wrote:

One thing to emphasize to players, when the time comes, is that a character being dead or "out" (in the sense you describe) does NOT mean that the player is out of the game. Granted, it's more fun to last all the way through, or to buy it big in the last scene, but it's perfectly OK to lose the PC relatively early and still be an active player, using "NPCs" and bidding and so on.

Best,
Ron


  This is true, and we encouraged the one player who died (really died, as in not coming back)to keep playing, but he felt like he was powerless with his character out and just passed.  Interesting, because in the game more or less the only power the character has is to get plot points.
  Which raises my objection to the idea that you can just keep on playing without a character.  Without a PC you quickly run out of plot points (you can't accomplish your goal, give hints, use traits) and are left powerless.  Though I suppose you could still rack a few up by guessing other's secrets...
  And finally, we played the method that you suggested, which is to say "no winners based on plot points" and it worked fine, but I almost wish there were another way to determine who won.  By default we assumed that it was to accomplish your goal and protect your secret but I wonder if there's some way to make that defined.  Hmmm, perhaps it already is...
 -Tor
Logged
Ron Edwards
Global Moderator
Member
*
Posts: 16490


WWW
« Reply #13 on: September 17, 2001, 07:30:00 AM »

Hey Tor,

"I almost wish there were another way to determine who won. By default we assumed that it was to accomplish your goal and protect your secret but I wonder if there's some way to make that defined. Hmmm, perhaps it already is..."

Two reactions.

1) If you want to "win" in Soap, just keep track of who SPENT more Tokens throughout. That ought to do it.

2) "Protect your Secret??!" Oh my God, that strikes me as a HORRIBLE criterion for winning. For me, the whole fun of Soap is to hint extravagantly and guess enthusiastically; guarding one's Secret as a means to win strikes me as totally counter to the most enjoyable aspects of the game.

A thought for class discussion: is "character removal" necessarily equated to "player failure" in all role-playing? It certainly is PERCEIVED to be that way, based on design considerations from (say) D&D, but MUST it be that way?

Best,
Ron
Logged
Tor Erickson
Member

Posts: 134


« Reply #14 on: September 17, 2001, 07:44:00 AM »

Quote

On 2001-09-17 11:30, Ron Edwards wrote:
2) "Protect your Secret??!" Oh my God, that strikes me as a HORRIBLE criterion for winning. For me, the whole fun of Soap is to hint extravagantly and guess enthusiastically; guarding one's Secret as a means to win strikes me as totally counter to the most enjoyable aspects of the game.

Best,
Ron


Well, in perhaps setting the record for number of posts and responses in a five minute period . . . I think I probably put it the wrong way when I mentioned protecting secrets.  In the sense that by revealing your secret you lose the greatest opportunity to get plot points (a potential five per round), it's encouraged to not blow it at the get-go in the game.
  As for the character death issue, SOAP really does raise an interesting point.  If your participation in the game is divorced from your character (to an extent, because in SOAP it's not totally divorced), what does PC death or removal matter?  This is some great stuff!
Thanks,
tor
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!