The Forge Forums Read-only Archives
The live Forge Forums
|
Articles
|
Reviews
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
March 05, 2014, 06:58:30 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes:
Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:
Advanced search
275647
Posts in
27717
Topics by
4283
Members Latest Member:
-
otto
Most online today:
55
- most online ever:
429
(November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
The Forge Archives
Independent Game Forums
Adept Press
(Moderator:
Ron Edwards
)
Odd idea for multiple-GM Sorcerer
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Author
Topic: Odd idea for multiple-GM Sorcerer (Read 710 times)
sirogit
Member
Posts: 503
Odd idea for multiple-GM Sorcerer
«
on:
November 06, 2003, 02:23:43 PM »
I've been thinking of several ways to do Sorcerer without a single designated GM, I had this idea:
Outside of conflicts with demons, other PCs and the elements of the Bang or Kicker a character is working on, the game is freeform controlled by whoever wishes to narrarate.
Your demon is controlled by the player on your right, and your kicker is controlled by the player next on your right.
So each player assumes three roles. Sorcerer, demon and GM.
This has the possibility to get pretty heavy. If such would be the case, the game could be run so that each session, it is focused on one Sorcerer.
The biggest part of this that would need to be written out would be the constraints of control over "Bangs". Perhaps you could have a list of people, places and things that the Bang is concerned with and are therefore controlled by that player, they would also be the ones to call Humanity rolls for things the character does to deal with that bang.
Another optionial idea, If there's a character that you don't have a demon belonging to, you can try to summon a demon with him as the controller, and if there's a player that you don't have an active Bang occuring to, you can make one for them.
This has alot of nice potentials such as a more flexible game group, with more people or with one person missing without it being a big deal. Think it could work?
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
=> Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
General Forge Forums
-----------------------------
=> First Thoughts
=> Playtesting
=> Endeavor
=> Actual Play
=> Publishing
=> Connections
=> Conventions
=> Site Discussion
-----------------------------
Archive
-----------------------------
=> RPG Theory
=> GNS Model Discussion
=> Indie Game Design
-----------------------------
Independent Game Forums
-----------------------------
=> Adept Press
=> Arkenstone Publishing
=> Beyond the Wire Productions
=> Black and Green Games
=> Bully Pulpit Games
=> Dark Omen Games
=> Dog Eared Designs
=> Eric J. Boyd Designs
=> Errant Knight Games
=> Galileo Games
=> glyphpress
=> Green Fairy Games
=> Half Meme Press
=> Incarnadine Press
=> lumpley games
=> Muse of Fire Games
=> ndp design
=> Night Sky Games
=> one.seven design
=> Robert Bohl Games
=> Stone Baby Games
=> These Are Our Games
=> Twisted Confessions
=> Universalis
=> Wild Hunt Studios
-----------------------------
Inactive Forums
-----------------------------
=> My Life With Master Playtest
=> Adamant Entertainment
=> Bob Goat Press
=> Burning Wheel
=> Cartoon Action Hour
=> Chimera Creative
=> CRN Games
=> Destroy All Games
=> Evilhat Productions
=> HeroQuest
=> Key 20 Publishing
=> Memento-Mori Theatricks
=> Mystic Ages Online
=> Orbit
=> Scattershot
=> Seraphim Guard
=> Wicked Press
=> Review Discussion
=> XIG Games
=> SimplePhrase Press
=> The Riddle of Steel
=> Random Order Creations
=> Forge Birthday Forum