*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 05, 2014, 04:33:25 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4283 Members Latest Member: - otto Most online today: 55 - most online ever: 429 (November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: Sometimes You Kick . . .  (Read 994 times)
Bill Cook
Member

Posts: 501


« on: February 02, 2004, 04:01:44 AM »

Last session, one of our players jumped up on a stone pedestal as a clawing, biting skeleton came towards him.  He proceeded to kick the thing in the head with a +1 CP height advantage (awarded by the Seneschal).  

This was that player's reasoning: his sole proficiency is Cut & Thrust with a rating of 6.  This gives him a default in Pugalism of 4 (6 - 2 = 4).  His reflex is 4, so his Pugalism combat pool is 8 (4 + 4 = 8).  The Kick maneuver costs 1 CP to activate, so that washes with the height advantage, leaving him his full pool to allocate across the round.

And this was my take: a leg is a leg, I don't care if your only proficiency is chopping vegatables.

Actually, in writing this, some things occur to me.  I infer the following design intent:

    [*]Every combat action must be a proficiency maneuver.
    [*]There is an assumed layer of matching weapon to maneuver (whose detail exceeds my topic).  With respect to unarmed combat, action is restricted to the list for Pugalism.
    [*]Furthermore, with the exception of parry, Pugalism maneuvers that are listed under other proficiencies are assumed to employ natural weapons (e.g. Declaring a kick with a Dagger proficiency), requiring their ATN's/DTN's and doing their damage.

    (In the case of a parry with a natural weapon, the effect is to deflect the damage to that location.)
    [/list:u]

    Accurate?
    Logged

    Jake Norwood
    Member

    Posts: 2261


    WWW
    « Reply #1 on: February 04, 2004, 03:07:21 PM »

    As a general rule that I'm working with for TFOB, maneuvers that "make sense," but that aren't neccessarily on this list, can be used at a "default" of -1 if it's pretty obvious (like kicking).  Using this rule he would have had 9 dice to attack with.  

    Your design notes appear right on.

    Jake
    Logged

    "Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing." -R.E. Howard The Tower of the Elephant
    ___________________
    www.theriddleofsteel.NET
    Bill Cook
    Member

    Posts: 501


    « Reply #2 on: February 04, 2004, 06:13:16 PM »

    Cool.  Thx:)
    Logged

    sgtnasty
    Member

    Posts: 6


    WWW
    « Reply #3 on: February 05, 2004, 07:16:20 AM »

    Quote from: Jake Norwood
    As a general rule that I'm working with for TFOB, maneuvers that "make sense," but that aren't neccessarily on this list, can be used at a "default" of -1 if it's pretty obvious (like kicking).  Using this rule he would have had 9 dice to attack with.  



    im still learning riddle of steel, so please bear with me, but what is TFOB?
    thanks
    Logged
    Mokkurkalfe
    Member

    Posts: 340


    « Reply #4 on: February 05, 2004, 08:09:39 AM »

    TFOB: Short for The Flower of Battle, which is an upcoming combat (mostly) supplement for The Riddle of Steel.
    Logged

    Joakim (with a k!) Israelsson
    Lance D. Allen
    Member

    Posts: 1962


    WWW
    « Reply #5 on: February 06, 2004, 08:35:28 AM »

    TRoS: The Riddle of Steel. Sometimes RoS.
    TFoB: The Flower of Battle, the combat supplement
    OBaM: Of Beasts and Men, the beastiary/NPC/non-humanoid combat rules supplement
    SatF: Sorcery and the Fey, the supplement dealing with.. well, sorcery, and the fey.
    Logged

    ~Lance Allen
    Wolves Den Publishing
    Eternally Incipient Publisher of Mage Blade, ReCoil and Rats in the Walls
    Brian Leybourne
    Member

    Posts: 1793


    « Reply #6 on: February 06, 2004, 12:51:10 PM »

    Not to forget...

    WLFLA: We Love Four-Letter Acronyms.

    D'oh! That's five.

    Brian. :-)
    Logged

    Brian Leybourne
    bleybourne@gmail.com

    RPG Books: Of Beasts and Men, The Flower of Battle, The TROS Companion
    sgtnasty
    Member

    Posts: 6


    WWW
    « Reply #7 on: February 06, 2004, 12:59:24 PM »

    Quote from: Wolfen
    SatF: Sorcery and the Fey, the supplement dealing with.. well, sorcery, and the fey.


    is this anywhere on the website?
    any date of possible release?
    Logged
    Lxndr
    Acts of Evil Playtesters
    Member

    Posts: 1113

    Master of the Inkstained Robes


    WWW
    « Reply #8 on: February 06, 2004, 01:00:33 PM »

    It's the most-looked-forward-to TRoS supplement.  Which means, if I remember right, it's the last planned release.  After Flower of Battle.
    Logged

    Alexander Cherry, Twisted Confessions Game Design
    Maker of many fine story-games!
    Moderator of Indie Netgaming
    Lance D. Allen
    Member

    Posts: 1962


    WWW
    « Reply #9 on: February 06, 2004, 02:34:34 PM »

    Don't listen to Lx. He's one of the rare few that isn't eagerly awaiting TFoB.

    And yes, I believe it's still on the website. I.. think there was a news tidbit about the cover of the book.
    Logged

    ~Lance Allen
    Wolves Den Publishing
    Eternally Incipient Publisher of Mage Blade, ReCoil and Rats in the Walls
    Pages: [1]
    Print
    Jump to:  

    Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
    Oxygen design by Bloc
    Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!