*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
October 25, 2014, 06:57:18 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4283 Members Latest Member: - otto Most online today: 68 - most online ever: 429 (November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: The Ballot System  (Read 1039 times)
Matt Gwinn
Acts of Evil Playtesters
Member

Posts: 547


WWW
« on: June 01, 2001, 11:44:00 PM »

I just had a new idea for a game mechanic and I was wondering what you all thought of it.
I was thinking that a player could announce what he wants to do and each of the other players and Game Master could vote on whether they feel the actions should succeed based on the situation and the particular character's involved.  The level of the action's success would be based on how many people voted for it.  I think this would eliminate the total randomness of dice.  Let's face it, we've all had those nights when the die rolls were just not going our way.

,Matt
Logged

Kayfabe: The Inside Wrestling Game
On sale now at
www.errantknightgames.com
james_west
Member

Posts: 292


WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2001, 01:49:00 PM »

I forget the term Edwards uses, but the main disadvantage I see is a lot of processing time for task resolution.
Logged
Ron Edwards
Global Moderator
Member
*
Posts: 16490


WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2001, 02:47:00 PM »

Hey there,

Interesting suggestion, definitely.

PART ONE
Quick note to James.

Handling time = finding out what mechanic or pre-determination modifiers are necessary

Search time = once the in-game action is determined, actually getting its impact on the game-world established

PART TWO
I have a problem with the voting mechanic, or really, any voting mechanic in role-playing. (I've seen several in RPGs, such as deciding who gets an extra bag o'experience, or actually voting on the GM's performance, and others.)

The problem is theoretical. It's based on the very PURPOSE of voting, under any circumstances - it is an excellent method for deciding upon group policy when there exists a clear, otherwise-unresolvable conflict of interest among the members.

Since the proposed action of the hero is NOT an expression of group policy, and since conflict-of-interest among players ABOUT that action seems like a very sticky issue to me (bringing in all sorts of things like popularity), I kind of blink and twitch at the idea of introducing voting into RPG mechanics.

But hey! I said it was a THEORETICAL objection. Theories are often hammerlocked by brutal facts. What the hell, someone should try it, or a variant of it, and see what happens.

Best,
Ron
Logged
Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!