The Forge Forums Read-only Archives
The live Forge Forums
|
Articles
|
Reviews
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
April 24, 2018, 03:03:55 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes:
Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:
Advanced search
275647
Posts in
27717
Topics by
4285
Members Latest Member:
-
Jason DAngelo
Most online today:
161
- most online ever:
429
(November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
The Forge Archives
Independent Game Forums
glyphpress
(Moderator:
Joshua A.C. Newman
)
[Shock:] Fiddling with minutiae rules
Pages: [
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Author
Topic: [Shock:] Fiddling with minutiae rules (Read 8794 times)
Troels
Member
Posts: 77
[Shock:] Fiddling with minutiae rules
«
on:
March 08, 2008, 06:49:08 AM »
Hello there
Last night I and a couple of friends played Shock:, and it was pretty cool, in the messed up way it's supposed to be. But discussing afterwards, we agreed on one thing, that we were somewhat aesthetically displeased by the extreme tendency of minutiae to decide conflicts.
Even with three players, where multiple players rolling for minutiae driving the minutiae die towards 4 wasn't an issue, it seemed, well, heavy. Minutiae are supposed to be important, but decisive on one side of the conflict, nearly all the time? We were a little annoyed. And being the kind of people who like to fiddle with things, we talked about tweaking. We came up with two different tweaks:
A) Reduce the weight of minutiae to one, and simply roll (d10s) for precedence.
B) Keeping the minutiae d4, but doubling everything else. D20s and d8s, fulcra of 6-15 or so. Which I just now realise will halve the chance of escalation.
Thoughts? Comments?
Yours, Troels
Logged
Joshua A.C. Newman
Moderator
Member
Posts: 1144
the glyphpress
Re: [Shock:] Fiddling with minutiae rules
«
Reply #1 on:
March 09, 2008, 12:03:54 PM »
Can you tell me what the Praxes and fulcra were?
Logged
the glyphpress
's games are
Shock: Social Science Fiction
and
Under the Bed
.
I
design books
like
Dogs in the Vineyard
and
The Mountain Witch
.
Troels
Member
Posts: 77
Re: [Shock:] Fiddling with minutiae rules
«
Reply #2 on:
March 09, 2008, 12:46:35 PM »
Um. Lets see...
Trust/Distrust and Duty/Morals. I don't recall the exact balances of all six *tags, and I don't have the notes, but they ranged all the way from moderate to extreme. It didn't seem to us, discussing afterwards, that the problem was "local", so to speak.
Yours, Troels
Logged
Joshua A.C. Newman
Moderator
Member
Posts: 1144
the glyphpress
Re: [Shock:] Fiddling with minutiae rules
«
Reply #3 on:
March 09, 2008, 05:40:56 PM »
Logged
the glyphpress
's games are
Shock: Social Science Fiction
and
Under the Bed
.
I
design books
like
Dogs in the Vineyard
and
The Mountain Witch
.
Greis
Member
Posts: 10
Re: [Shock:] Fiddling with minutiae rules
«
Reply #4 on:
March 11, 2008, 01:23:03 PM »
Hiya,
I just happen to be one of Troels' fellow players, and I have the fulcra here.
Protag:
Martin Holz, entertainmentprogrammer: Trust 3 Distrust, Duty 7 Morals
Alan Babbage, employee for the UploadService: 6 and 6
Theodor van Arno, The Count of New York: 5 and 4
Antag:
The UploadService: Trust 7 Distrust, Duty 4 Morals
The UploadService: 8 and 3
The UploadService: 4 and 3
(Note: We chose on purpose to have the same antag. Each protag had his own version of the antag with it's own features and with it's own agenda.
BTW we only had one minutiae die rolling, we just concluded that with e.g. a five player you'd have three dice and hence a relatively large chance of rolling a least one '4'.
Also we like the use of the minutiae, since it keep the audience active and the added details are fun. It just seemed to influence the outcome too much.
Logged
Joshua A.C. Newman
Moderator
Member
Posts: 1144
the glyphpress
Re: [Shock:] Fiddling with minutiae rules
«
Reply #5 on:
March 11, 2008, 02:06:30 PM »
Wait, you're complaining about a *hypothetical* problem?
Logged
the glyphpress
's games are
Shock: Social Science Fiction
and
Under the Bed
.
I
design books
like
Dogs in the Vineyard
and
The Mountain Witch
.
Greis
Member
Posts: 10
Re: [Shock:] Fiddling with minutiae rules
«
Reply #6 on:
March 11, 2008, 02:17:35 PM »
Well, yes and no.
We're complaining about the large influence of the minutiae die. The hypothetical aspect is that with a larger audience the problem becomes more significant.
Often the single minutiae die were decisive in whatever conflict it was involved in.
Logged
Troels
Member
Posts: 77
Re: [Shock:] Fiddling with minutiae rules
«
Reply #7 on:
March 11, 2008, 02:52:45 PM »
Quote from: Joshua A.C. Newman on March 11, 2008, 02:06:30 PM
Wait, you're complaining about a *hypothetical* problem?
Out of about ten scenes total, we didn't have minutiae in ~3 or 4, and in the rest, it failed to be decisive in no more than two cases, IIRC. And that was with only one audience member. So we thought, analysing afterwards, what'll it be like with three or four in the audience? So we started fiddling, as we mean to run Shock at a danish convention next week.
Yours, Troels
Logged
Joshua A.C. Newman
Moderator
Member
Posts: 1144
the glyphpress
Re: [Shock:] Fiddling with minutiae rules
«
Reply #8 on:
March 11, 2008, 02:58:25 PM »
Ah! OK.
I'm perfectly happy with the likelihood of a single Minutia die. Those 5s and 6s make the Minutia die more powerful, though. If you don't want that, move the fulcra outward. The 3, 7, and 4, statistically speaking, keep the events more in the hands of the players.
Now, it comes down to luck pretty often. Shock: doesn't afford you a lot of control over the course of events of the story. That's because what's important is what you're *saying*, what you're fighting *about*, rather than whether or not you win.
Try it with the tie rule mentioned elsewhere. Let me know how it goes! (That is, all tied Minutia dice are taken off the table.)
Logged
the glyphpress
's games are
Shock: Social Science Fiction
and
Under the Bed
.
I
design books
like
Dogs in the Vineyard
and
The Mountain Witch
.
Greis
Member
Posts: 10
Re: [Shock:] Fiddling with minutiae rules
«
Reply #9 on:
March 11, 2008, 11:21:06 PM »
Just out of curiosity, doesn't it sort of go against the idea of the fulcrum if you pick your abilities at extreme end of the scale?
I sort of consider the two sides of the fulcra as two viable strategies, one which is favored by my character, and one which isnt', but if I need to pick abilities at the extreme end (like a 3 or 4), then the likelyhood of succeeding at anything with least favored is close to nil.
If this is purpose, then my strategy seems to be wether or not I want to succeed at anything - in the beginning of the game I might want to increase my features through defeat, hence choosing to roll less than 3, and later in the game I might want a happy end, hence choosing to roll above 3 with huge pool of dice.
Well, I know this all speculative, but I hope you could clarify some the intentions and strategies, this I wasn't aware of the importance of chance and luck in Shock. This is my first time with the 1.1-rules, and the permanent presence of the minutiae die was quite a change from the occasional minutiae die under the 1.0 rules.
Logged
TempvsMortis
Member
Posts: 84
Re: [Shock:] Fiddling with minutiae rules
«
Reply #10 on:
May 13, 2008, 03:06:32 PM »
I think the "tied dice cancel" rule would work, but I think that is a legitimate point that with enough spectators the chance of even one of them having a 4 increases. Maybe a voting system could work, where only one die is rolled, and then all of (or a majority of) the spectators have to decide what side that die affects. A system could probably be used to break ties. Or, the first conflict is assigned to one spectator, and then ever conflict after that is passed clockwise to the next spectator, this way still only one die is rolled, but everyone still gets to have a hand in affecting outcomes, but because it's turn based no-one steps on each other's toes.
Just suggestions.
Logged
Joshua A.C. Newman
Moderator
Member
Posts: 1144
the glyphpress
Re: [Shock:] Fiddling with minutiae rules
«
Reply #11 on:
May 13, 2008, 08:29:47 PM »
Logged
the glyphpress
's games are
Shock: Social Science Fiction
and
Under the Bed
.
I
design books
like
Dogs in the Vineyard
and
The Mountain Witch
.
TempvsMortis
Member
Posts: 84
Re: [Shock:] Fiddling with minutiae rules
«
Reply #12 on:
May 13, 2008, 08:43:52 PM »
Call me William then. And I also suggested a turn based method remember? Where authority is absolute, but passed around.
Logged
Joshua A.C. Newman
Moderator
Member
Posts: 1144
the glyphpress
Re: [Shock:] Fiddling with minutiae rules
«
Reply #13 on:
May 13, 2008, 08:45:52 PM »
There can be, max, three specators. I don't think it really matters. Most of the time there's one or two.
Logged
the glyphpress
's games are
Shock: Social Science Fiction
and
Under the Bed
.
I
design books
like
Dogs in the Vineyard
and
The Mountain Witch
.
TempvsMortis
Member
Posts: 84
Re: [Shock:] Fiddling with minutiae rules
«
Reply #14 on:
May 13, 2008, 08:49:14 PM »
I've actually been wondering this then: if there's supposed to be max 5 players, then how come the grid has five issue and five shock slots? Shouldn't it be four, because with five players the most you could have is four issues and a shock.
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
=> Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
General Forge Forums
-----------------------------
=> First Thoughts
=> Playtesting
=> Endeavor
=> Actual Play
=> Publishing
=> Connections
=> Conventions
=> Site Discussion
-----------------------------
Archive
-----------------------------
=> RPG Theory
=> GNS Model Discussion
=> Indie Game Design
-----------------------------
Independent Game Forums
-----------------------------
=> Adept Press
=> Arkenstone Publishing
=> Beyond the Wire Productions
=> Black and Green Games
=> Bully Pulpit Games
=> Dark Omen Games
=> Dog Eared Designs
=> Eric J. Boyd Designs
=> Errant Knight Games
=> Galileo Games
=> glyphpress
=> Green Fairy Games
=> Half Meme Press
=> Incarnadine Press
=> lumpley games
=> Muse of Fire Games
=> ndp design
=> Night Sky Games
=> one.seven design
=> Robert Bohl Games
=> Stone Baby Games
=> These Are Our Games
=> Twisted Confessions
=> Universalis
=> Wild Hunt Studios
-----------------------------
Inactive Forums
-----------------------------
=> My Life With Master Playtest
=> Adamant Entertainment
=> Bob Goat Press
=> Burning Wheel
=> Cartoon Action Hour
=> Chimera Creative
=> CRN Games
=> Destroy All Games
=> Evilhat Productions
=> HeroQuest
=> Key 20 Publishing
=> Memento-Mori Theatricks
=> Mystic Ages Online
=> Orbit
=> Scattershot
=> Seraphim Guard
=> Wicked Press
=> Review Discussion
=> XIG Games
=> SimplePhrase Press
=> The Riddle of Steel
=> Random Order Creations
=> Forge Birthday Forum