The Forge Forums Read-only Archives
The live Forge Forums
|
Articles
|
Reviews
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
March 05, 2014, 06:34:02 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes:
Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:
Advanced search
275647
Posts in
27717
Topics by
4283
Members Latest Member:
-
otto
Most online today:
55
- most online ever:
429
(November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
The Forge Archives
General Forge Forums
First Thoughts
(Moderator:
Ron Edwards
)
Need advice for damage dealing rules
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Author
Topic: Need advice for damage dealing rules (Read 515 times)
DDurand
Registree
Posts: 2
Need advice for damage dealing rules
«
on:
December 03, 2008, 09:30:17 PM »
Logged
David C
Member
Posts: 262
lost in the woods...
Re: Need advice for damage dealing rules
«
Reply #1 on:
December 03, 2008, 10:53:30 PM »
Since you seem to struggle with English, allow me to offer some alternatives, if you plan on writing your game in English. What language are you writing your game for?
Charisma I would change to Presence (as in, looks powerful) or if you meant "looks good" I'd go with something like Allure, Attractiveness or Appearance.
Dexterity I would change to Manual Dexterity (which is dexterity in the hands).
Your second method is superior I think, even if it uses more dice. First of all, it doesn't require complicated math, which is always a no-no. Secondly, it lets you use one mechanic to accomplish two goals, which lets players learn your game faster.
As general advice, I would look at using a lot of rules that incorporate high ground, direction, defense types, weapon choices, etc. if you're looking for a tactical game. A lot of people think that by increasing the character building decisions, you are making your game more strategic. If those choices don't give players more tactical choices, they aren't actually contributing to the strategy of the game! In D&D, things like Charge and Flanking improve the tactics. Things like Weapon Focus (+1 attack or damage) aren't actually achieving the goal of making the game more strategic.
Logged
...but enjoying the scenery.
Creatures of Destiny
Member
Posts: 66
Re: Need advice for damage dealing rules
«
Reply #2 on:
December 04, 2008, 03:05:46 PM »
By "par" you mean "even" numbers right? (as in 2, 4, 6, 8, 10). It took a while to get that, I looked at the examples then checked by reading "par" in Italian ("pari" in Italian means "even") and then taking it back to English.
Bu this leads to the obvious question - statistically if the only thing you're taking from the dice is "odd and even" then that's exactly the same as just flipping coins (which is simpler). IF you're rolling dice then the numbers should DO SOMETHING.
So why not just flip coins, with each heads ("teste") giving 1 point and each tails ("Croce") giving 0 points?
Okay, onto damage:
The first system will slow your game to a crawl unless these number are worked out beforehand and written on character sheets. But remember if you start adding modifiers due to tactics it'll slow down again. Also that complexity gains nothing in either realism or player choice.
The second system makes more sense and is faster, but it's still a little cumbersome and not very elegant.
Why not just multiply the damage number by the amount you won the "to hit" roll by and compare tha number to Vitality. That way you save yourself a whole bunch of rolls.
Logged
DDurand
Registree
Posts: 2
Re: Need advice for damage dealing rules
«
Reply #3 on:
December 04, 2008, 11:36:53 PM »
Thank for your replies.
The game is writen in french (and you probably don't want to read an entire book writen by me in english).
I used Babelfish for translate words i don't know. Pair is translated by "par", and it's "0-2-4-6-8".
-----
Technically, my first idea was to use coins. Loved the idea. But then i think i forgot the critical rolls.
0/10 is a critical success.
1 is a critical fail.
If i use coins, i don't have criticals anymore. 10-sides dices have a a good critical ratio, and roll better.
When you roll more 1 than 0, you have a critical fail equal to number of ones minus number of 0.
It's the opposite for critical success.
Since a critical is a new roll, you roll as much dices your critical is, and you don't count opposite results.
Example :
You roll 5 dices and get 2.8.1.0.0
That mean 4 evens (0 are evens), then a result of 4, but also 1 critical fail and 2 critical success.
2 CS - 1 CF = 1 critical success. You roll 1 new dice.
It's a Critical success dice, then it ignore totally fail results (odds), normals or criticals.
That mean if it do 2, 4, 6 or 8, it just add one to the result, and if it do 0, it add 1 AND reroll for a new critical success dice.
When a Critical fail dice do an odd result, it's a negative point (that minus the result).
---
For the damages, you ask why i don't just multiply the damage number by the amount the player won in the Hit roll ?
One roll for Hit
and
Damages, you mean ?
Well, the "to hit" roll is only for know if you hit. Strength is not used. Worst : If you try to boost your strength, you lost in precision.
Hits are mostly determined by Agility
Damages are mostly determined by Strength
Of course, really good hit can do special damages. If you won by some amount, you can upgrade the wound level you have just done in some cases (you just hit vital organs, for example), at least if the ennemy don't have armor solid armor (because solid armor don't let you hit exactly what you want).
But i prefer to differenciate them.
---
Charisma is "Charme" in the original. It's mostly "looking good".
Dexterity, in french IS "hand dexterity". It's why there is an Agility characteristic too. For example, Humans have a good Agility and a really good Dexterity, but Tigers have a very good agility and only a good Dexterity (and with their also superior Strength, totally "pwn" Humans in hand to hand combat, but are not so good in firearm fights - You imagine the social problems in the worlds where the two exists in civilized forms where firearms appears. Well, true, they can also have superior body armors and biggers weapons. Imagine an army that have .50 assault rifles...).
Tactical game : Yes, it's what i look for.
As for "weapon focus", there is Skill as "weapons mastery" that add dices to the hit roll and skills that reduce situation maluses, mostly.
Berserk is a skill you can add to your Strength when doing damage, but let you suffer an heavy malus to hit, for example.
There is also rules for outmanoeuver your opponent, differienciate parrying and dodge, feint, localizing wounds, etc.
And the choice of the weapon is also important.
In fact, with this rules, as i said, an experienced fighter can easily be killed by simple grunts if he's not carefull, only because the tactical problems.
Logged
Creatures of Destiny
Member
Posts: 66
Re: Need advice for damage dealing rules
«
Reply #4 on:
December 05, 2008, 05:23:36 AM »
Dexterity in English is also "hand dexterity" it's just D&D that made people in the RPG hobby forget this.
Armour protecting vital points is a good idea and I haven't seen much of it in any RPGs I can think off.
The odds/evens with criticals makes more senes- you could just think of them as "complications" - for example someone could hit but their sword gets stuck or whatever.
Apart from that you probably won't know till you play it a few times to see how it flows.
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
=> Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
General Forge Forums
-----------------------------
=> First Thoughts
=> Playtesting
=> Endeavor
=> Actual Play
=> Publishing
=> Connections
=> Conventions
=> Site Discussion
-----------------------------
Archive
-----------------------------
=> RPG Theory
=> GNS Model Discussion
=> Indie Game Design
-----------------------------
Independent Game Forums
-----------------------------
=> Adept Press
=> Arkenstone Publishing
=> Beyond the Wire Productions
=> Black and Green Games
=> Bully Pulpit Games
=> Dark Omen Games
=> Dog Eared Designs
=> Eric J. Boyd Designs
=> Errant Knight Games
=> Galileo Games
=> glyphpress
=> Green Fairy Games
=> Half Meme Press
=> Incarnadine Press
=> lumpley games
=> Muse of Fire Games
=> ndp design
=> Night Sky Games
=> one.seven design
=> Robert Bohl Games
=> Stone Baby Games
=> These Are Our Games
=> Twisted Confessions
=> Universalis
=> Wild Hunt Studios
-----------------------------
Inactive Forums
-----------------------------
=> My Life With Master Playtest
=> Adamant Entertainment
=> Bob Goat Press
=> Burning Wheel
=> Cartoon Action Hour
=> Chimera Creative
=> CRN Games
=> Destroy All Games
=> Evilhat Productions
=> HeroQuest
=> Key 20 Publishing
=> Memento-Mori Theatricks
=> Mystic Ages Online
=> Orbit
=> Scattershot
=> Seraphim Guard
=> Wicked Press
=> Review Discussion
=> XIG Games
=> SimplePhrase Press
=> The Riddle of Steel
=> Random Order Creations
=> Forge Birthday Forum