The Forge Forums Read-only Archives
The live Forge Forums
|
Articles
|
Reviews
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
March 05, 2014, 08:04:14 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes:
Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:
Advanced search
275647
Posts in
27717
Topics by
4283
Members Latest Member:
-
otto
Most online today:
56
- most online ever:
429
(November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
The Forge Archives
Inactive Forums
The Riddle of Steel
armor rule question
Pages:
1
...
3
4
[
5
]
« previous
next »
Author
Topic: armor rule question (Read 6541 times)
Jake Norwood
Member
Posts: 2261
armor rule question
«
Reply #60 on:
August 01, 2003, 12:04:56 PM »
Chain is heavy, and it'll slow you down and cause over-commitment to moves unless effort is expended to prevent that. Effort is represented in CP.
Jake
Logged
"Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing." -R.E. Howard
The Tower of the Elephant
___________________
www.theriddleofsteel.NET
Caz
Member
Posts: 272
armor rule question
«
Reply #61 on:
August 01, 2003, 12:28:22 PM »
Seeing as how mail wouldn't hinder someone who trained in it, I think the effort is better represented in fatigue.
Logged
Mike Holmes
Acts of Evil Playtesters
Member
Posts: 10459
armor rule question
«
Reply #62 on:
August 01, 2003, 12:37:00 PM »
The point of debate, Caz, is whether or not one actually can overcome that weight. Jakes side looks like this:
There's only so much effort that you can expend at one time. This is represented as CP. If some is going towards countering the weight of mail, then you have less CP.
I sorta support this argument, because I'm an advocate for CP as effort.
What I proposed once, when debating this same thing earlier (is this the second or third time we've hit this?), is allowing a player to burn through an extra "turn" of endurance if he wants to eliminate his CP penalty for weightly armor. Representing even more effort than normal. This effectively halves the time a person can fight at absolutely full effectiveness in armor as a trade-off for getting those dice back.
That said, I understand Jake's point, and agree that to a small extent, there's no getting around the fact that you'd be slowed slightly. And Jake's waaay more an expert than I am on the practicality of it. In any case, we're quibbling over one die. Not a big deal.
Mike
Logged
Member of
Indie Netgaming
-Get your indie game fix online.
Caz
Member
Posts: 272
armor rule question
«
Reply #63 on:
August 01, 2003, 01:00:00 PM »
I agree it's no big deal, the rules are fine as is. House rules happen.
But I have my house rules from my personal experience. Mail is heavy, and it will burn you out quicker, but if you've trained in it, it does not EFFECTIVELY slow you down, slow your techniques, or hinder you in combat. You can cut just as fast, and sprint just as fast in it (you'll just drop a lot quicker from the effort). Same with plate arm/leg armour.
Here's some of my view on particular armour types and why they have different penalties:
(assumed it's fitted)
For helms/helmets- a "kettle" helmet, or war hat- no penalties (it doesn't get in your way, and doesn't hinder vision or hearing)
A barbute- no cp penalties (it doesn't get in the way, and you can see just fine) but -1 per due to muffled hearing.
A close helmet, with the visor down- -1 cp and -2 per (if it has narrow sights, -1 cp for limited vision, -2 per for vision and hearing)
etc. etc.
most body armour wouldn't hinder movement, but the only type that would give a -1 cp is a rigid, 1 piece plate cuirass, that might keep you from ducking as well, or fully bringing your arms inward.
Like I said, just my house rules, not really arguing, but this is really from my experience, not conjecture.
Logged
Pages:
1
...
3
4
[
5
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
=> Welcome to the Archives
-----------------------------
General Forge Forums
-----------------------------
=> First Thoughts
=> Playtesting
=> Endeavor
=> Actual Play
=> Publishing
=> Connections
=> Conventions
=> Site Discussion
-----------------------------
Archive
-----------------------------
=> RPG Theory
=> GNS Model Discussion
=> Indie Game Design
-----------------------------
Independent Game Forums
-----------------------------
=> Adept Press
=> Arkenstone Publishing
=> Beyond the Wire Productions
=> Black and Green Games
=> Bully Pulpit Games
=> Dark Omen Games
=> Dog Eared Designs
=> Eric J. Boyd Designs
=> Errant Knight Games
=> Galileo Games
=> glyphpress
=> Green Fairy Games
=> Half Meme Press
=> Incarnadine Press
=> lumpley games
=> Muse of Fire Games
=> ndp design
=> Night Sky Games
=> one.seven design
=> Robert Bohl Games
=> Stone Baby Games
=> These Are Our Games
=> Twisted Confessions
=> Universalis
=> Wild Hunt Studios
-----------------------------
Inactive Forums
-----------------------------
=> My Life With Master Playtest
=> Adamant Entertainment
=> Bob Goat Press
=> Burning Wheel
=> Cartoon Action Hour
=> Chimera Creative
=> CRN Games
=> Destroy All Games
=> Evilhat Productions
=> HeroQuest
=> Key 20 Publishing
=> Memento-Mori Theatricks
=> Mystic Ages Online
=> Orbit
=> Scattershot
=> Seraphim Guard
=> Wicked Press
=> Review Discussion
=> XIG Games
=> SimplePhrase Press
=> The Riddle of Steel
=> Random Order Creations
=> Forge Birthday Forum