I am going to run a game of With Great Power as GM. We start the day after tomorrow. Actually I expect character creation to take all of the first evening.
There are several points I still don't understand. One is heroes ganging up on a villain. It has been discussed several times here. One example is this thread:
http://www.indie-rpgs.com/forum/index.php?topic=18981.0
Michael Miller said that you should check stakes for compatibility. To me it seems to be a very great constraint on the heroes. In some cases you might as well stay out of the fight.
An example: Fearless Knight and Shining Hero are guarding the Object of Unopposable Puissance. Along comes Misdemeanant, and picks a fight with Fearless Knight. His stakes: he excapes with the OUP.
Now Shining Hero wants to pick a fight with Misdemeanant, but if he must pick a stake compatible with Misdemeanant escaping with the OUP, he might as well not bother. If all Misdemeanant cares about is getting away with the OUP (some villains are like that), he can simply yield to Shining Hero on his first turn, thus avoiding wasting cards on him.
In principle Shining Hero might pick some stakes that Misdemeanant really doesn't want to come to pass. But does he know him well enough to do that? Is there anything he can do in this situation? (Yes, "I'll castrate him" would probably work, but it doesn't really fit the genre). And even if he does find something, it is still not satasfactory that he can not oppose the theft directly. That is what he came to do.
Another problem is one of timing. In the thread referenced above, Michael Miller says:
QuoteSo, if Mudslide wins against Noir, but loses to Debris, what happens to Pearl? Good question. That becomes your Scripting Question for Step 4C: Winning the Stakes. Off the top of my head, I'd suggest that Mudslide hurls Pearl out of the scene into somewhere undesirable, or hides her down in the sewer before being captured. Or perhaps he engulfs her inside his gooey mass, so that she's trapped inside him even as he's hauled off to the pokey. I'm sure your group can come up with others.
But what if Debris defeats Mudslide quickly, and Mudslide then goes on to defeat Noir after a lengthy battle?
Quote from: klausok on May 16, 2006, 01:28:13 PM
Michael Miller said that you should check stakes for compatibility. To me it seems to be a very great constraint on the heroes. In some cases you might as well stay out of the fight.
An example: Fearless Knight and Shining Hero are guarding the Object of Unopposable Puissance. Along comes Misdemeanant, and picks a fight with Fearless Knight. His stakes: he excapes with the OUP.
Now Shining Hero wants to pick a fight with Misdemeanant, but if he must pick a stake compatible with Misdemeanant escaping with the OUP, he might as well not bother. If all Misdemeanant cares about is getting away with the OUP (some villains are like that), he can simply yield to Shining Hero on his first turn, thus avoiding wasting cards on him.
In principle Shining Hero might pick some stakes that Misdemeanant really doesn't want to come to pass. But does he know him well enough to do that? Is there anything he can do in this situation? (Yes, "I'll castrate him" would probably work, but it doesn't really fit the genre). And even if he does find something, it is still not satasfactory that he can not oppose the theft directly. That is what he came to do.
If Misdemeanant looses the page of conflict, he does not get to escape with the OUP. If you lose a page of conflict, you do not get what you were staking. In this case, the opposing stakes for Shining Knight would be something like "Not only does Misdemeanant not get away with the OUP, I also thrash him soundly and haul him off to jail." The stakes for Fearless Knight might be "I look good while helping battle Misdemeanant.", with opposing stakes "Not only does Fearless Knight look bad, he accidentally helps me."
Quote from: klausok on May 16, 2006, 01:28:13 PM
Another problem is one of timing. In the thread referenced above, Michael Miller says:
QuoteSo, if Mudslide wins against Noir, but loses to Debris, what happens to Pearl? Good question. That becomes your Scripting Question for Step 4C: Winning the Stakes. Off the top of my head, I'd suggest that Mudslide hurls Pearl out of the scene into somewhere undesirable, or hides her down in the sewer before being captured. Or perhaps he engulfs her inside his gooey mass, so that she's trapped inside him even as he's hauled off to the pokey. I'm sure your group can come up with others.
But what if Debris defeats Mudslide quickly, and Mudslide then goes on to defeat Noir after a lengthy battle?
Remember, if Mudslide is a villain, he uses cards from one (much larger) hand to battle both Debris and Noir. So this is a less likely scenario than you might think. However, in the unlikely even that this happens, I'd just keep Debris in the fight narration, and remember that at the end of the scene, she has won her stakes, and pencil/ink accordingly.
Let me see if I get this right. If you are involved in several pages of conflict simultaneously, you do not get to choose separate stakes for each. You have one set of stakes, and you must win all pages to win them. Is that the way it is?
Quote from: klausok on May 17, 2006, 11:46:35 AM
Let me see if I get this right. If you are involved in several pages of conflict simultaneously, you do not get to choose separate stakes for each. You have one set of stakes, and you must win all pages to win them. Is that the way it is?
NO. Stakes attach to pages of conflict. Each page has two Stakes: the hero's Stake and the villain's Stake.
Back to your original question. What I've done when this comes up is either hold off on the final description of the first conflict until the second conflict is through, and then weave them all together. OR, we describe the resolution of the first conflict in such a way that it fits in with the on-going second conflict. Varies from case to case.
BTW, the "bad guy gets away with dingus" is actually TWO Stakes: 1) bad guy escapes and 2) dingus leaves scene how I want it to. Therefore, it's not legit. The bad guy's gotta be fighting to get away (a stupid Stake, generally speaking) or to control how the dingus leaves the scene.
Theare are no 2-for-1 specials when setting Stakes.
Does that help?
Quote from: Michael S. Miller on May 17, 2006, 12:54:47 PM
Quote from: klausok on May 17, 2006, 11:46:35 AM
Let me see if I get this right. If you are involved in several pages of conflict simultaneously, you do not get to choose separate stakes for each. You have one set of stakes, and you must win all pages to win them. Is that the way it is?
NO. Stakes attach to pages of conflict. Each page has two Stakes: the hero's Stake and the villain's Stake.
But above you say
Quote
If Misdemeanant looses the page of conflict, he does not get to escape with the OUP.
even though escaping with the OUP was his stake in another conflict.
Quote from: Michael S. Miller on May 17, 2006, 12:54:47 PM
BTW, the "bad guy gets away with dingus" is actually TWO Stakes: 1) bad guy escapes and 2) dingus leaves scene how I want it to. Therefore, it's not legit. The bad guy's gotta be fighting to get away (a stupid Stake, generally speaking) or to control how the dingus leaves the scene.
Theare are no 2-for-1 specials when setting Stakes.
"If I win Pearl leaves the scene with me" is also Mudslide getting away AND Pearl being with him.
Quote from: Michael S. Miller on May 17, 2006, 12:54:47 PM
Does that help?
Not really. I still don't see how a second hero can effect the outcome. Let me rephrase the stakes:
It is for some reason essential that this object does not leave the building.
Villain: if win, the object leaves the building.
Hero 1: If I win it doesn't, and you get captured.
What can a second hero do stop the villain?
Let me help a little.
klausok, the first reply to your post wasn't from Michael Miller, it was from Kai_lord. From reading his/her response, it seems that he/she confused the stakes from FK with the stakes from SH. This explains the comment about not getting your stakes if you lose the page - I think Kai thought the wrong page was being lost.
As to the mudslide "she leaves with me" stakes, notice that mudslide's stakes do not include him getting away clean, just that Pearl leaves with him. If he goes to jail, she's there, too. Perhaps a more easily scriptable stake would have been "I control how she leaves the scene" of "she goes where I want her to," but it's not a question of 2-for-1 there.
Quote from: yogshog on May 20, 2006, 01:49:59 PM
Let me help a little.
klausok, the first reply to your post wasn't from Michael Miller, it was from Kai_lord.
Oops! Sorry about that. The first thing to go blind is the eyes, as the saying goes in these parts.
Quote from: klausok on May 17, 2006, 01:24:44 PM
Not really. I still don't see how a second hero can effect the outcome. Let me rephrase the stakes:
It is for some reason essential that this object does not leave the building.
Villain: if win, the object leaves the building.
Hero 1: If I win it doesn't, and you get captured.
What can a second hero do stop the villain?
Forgive me for butting in but I think I noticed something.
Hero 1 has asked for two outcomes to his stakes. The object doesn't leave the building *and* the villain is captured. Perhaps it would work this way.
Villain: If I win, the object leaves the building (or I control the location of the object)
Hero 1: If I win it doesn't.
Hero 2: If I win the villain is captured.
This leaves either page of stakes capable of being lost without affecting the other. For example, Hero 1 wins but Hero 2 doesn't. The villain get's away but the Heros retain control of the object. However, if Hero 1 loses and Hero 2 wins, then the Villain is captured but perhaps an agent secrets the object out from under the Heros noses. Feels good for a comic book to me.
Just my thoughts.
Quote from: Tindalos on June 05, 2006, 10:14:27 PM
Quote from: klausok on May 17, 2006, 01:24:44 PM
Not really. I still don't see how a second hero can effect the outcome. Let me rephrase the stakes:
It is for some reason essential that this object does not leave the building.
Villain: if win, the object leaves the building.
Hero 1: If I win it doesn't, and you get captured.
What can a second hero do stop the villain?
Forgive me for butting in but I think I noticed something.
Hero 1 has asked for two outcomes to his stakes. The object doesn't leave the building *and* the villain is captured. Perhaps it would work this way.
Villain: If I win, the object leaves the building (or I control the location of the object)
Hero 1: If I win it doesn't.
Hero 2: If I win the villain is captured.
This leaves either page of stakes capable of being lost without affecting the other. For example, Hero 1 wins but Hero 2 doesn't. The villain get's away but the Heros retain control of the object. However, if Hero 1 loses and Hero 2 wins, then the Villain is captured but perhaps an agent secrets the object out from under the Heros noses. Feels good for a comic book to me.
Just my thoughts.
No. The villain not getting his stake if he loses is automatic. The hero's stake is what he gets out of it in addition to that.
But more important, what I am after here is a way to do some actual teamwork. To have several heroes work towards the same result. Hero 2 wants the object to stay in the building. Capturing the villain would be nice, but not nearly as important. What can he do? There is nothing to prevent the villain from simply yielding to hero 2. This will cost him 1 random card. That is the extend of hero 2's influence on the outcome: stealing 1 random card from the villain. That is not how it works in the comics. Teamwork is the reason hero teams exist. A system that forbids it seems seriously weird to me.
We will have to come up with some sort of houserule when (not if) this comes up in play.
Hey, Klausok, one very quick note.
Quote from: klausok on June 06, 2006, 05:31:52 PM
Teamwork is the reason hero teams exist. A system that forbids it seems seriously weird to me.
There's nothing in the world that stops Colussus's player from changing style to "Attack with Weapon" and inking the panel as "I pick up Wolverine and throw him at the Sentinel." Looks like teamwork to me.
Quote from: Michael S. Miller on June 07, 2006, 12:07:44 PM
Hey, Klausok, one very quick note.
Quote from: klausok on June 06, 2006, 05:31:52 PM
Teamwork is the reason hero teams exist. A system that forbids it seems seriously weird to me.
There's nothing in the world that stops Colussus's player from changing style to "Attack with Weapon" and inking the panel as "I pick up Wolverine and throw him at the Sentinel." Looks like teamwork to me.
Not to me. The way the rules work, Wolverine's presence is no help to Colossus. He might as well have thrown a bystander. Or a dime. Yes, I know: that is a simulationist viewpoint. But I find it a great advantage if the choices that make sense ruleswise are the same that makes sense storywise.
And I must say that I can not think of any conflict in the comics that worked like that. Two heroes simultaneously but quite independently fighting the same villain. If Wolverine defeats Sentinel, Sentinel is captured, otherwise he escapes. If Colossus defeats Sentinel the theft they came to prevent is prevented, otherwise it occurs. With no effect of one one the other. It just makes no sense at all to me.
When I say teamwork I mean two or more heroes working together to the same end, and actually making a difference.
You must read different comics than I do.
Only rarely have I seen any where the heroes seem to be working together other than in the vaguest "we're all here at the same time" sense.
In fact, most of the time they look much like kung fu movies where the enemy gang throws themselves into the fray one at a time so they can all get beat up one by one.
Panel: here's hero # 1 shooting a power blast at the villain...there's the villain using some object to reflect the power blast back at hero #1, hero #1 goes flying into a wall.
Panel: here's hero #2 charging in with his super strength...there's the villain hurling hero #2 into the air and out of frame
Pane: here's hero #3 calling on the powers of mystic darkness...there's the villain using his anti magic ray to render hero #3 powerless.
1) What specific examples of team work are you thinking you see in comic books.
2) Keep this in mind. With Great Power... is NOT NOT NOT about simulating a world where super heroes exist. It IS IS IS about simulating how comic books work.
Yes, the writer of a the comic could have Colosus throw a bystander, or a dime...or a city bus...or whatever. Instead he chooses to throw Wolverine. Why...because throwing Wolverine somehow makes the attack more effective? Bah, the attack will be exactly as effective as the writer, inker, and colorist say it is. If the writer says Wolverine made all the difference, then that's the way it gets inked and colored...there's certainly no mechanical advantage to the writer for saying it that way...he could just as easily blow up the sentinel with a dime.
So what are the reasons why a comic book writer would want us the audience to specifically see Colossus throw Wolverine. What MESSAGE is he trying to send by inking that. What meaning is being conveyed...in the recent movie there is a clear message and it has nothing to do with increasing the odds of success. In X-III the writer has Colossus throw Wolvie precisely to show that Wolvie CAN be a team player (he spent the rest of the scene doing not much) IF the team play is done on his terms. It was a bit of petty rebelliousness against Storm's authority as we see later in the scene.
THAT'S why Colossus throws Wolvie.
And that's how you have to think in order to play WGP. There's a reason why the process is called penciling, inking, and coloring. Because you as a player WHILE YOU PLAY, have to be in the mindset NOT of your character but of the writer of a comic (who gets into the mindset of the characters exactly as much as he needs to make the story he wants to tell convincing).
The choices DO make sense rules wise AND storywise...because storywise is the absolute only thing the rules are designed to do.
If there's a reason to illustrate the characters working together as a team in order to enhance the message of the issue you're focusing on...then do so...do so because that's what a writer would do who is interested in writing a good story...not because theres a "tactical advantage" to doing so. The game is about simulating being the writer...not simulating being the hero.
Conversely...and beneficially...there is no mechanical advantage to not doing so. If you want to show Cyclops walking out in a huff being all petulent because that says something about the ISSUE you're focusing on. Do it. Do it because its right for the story. As a bonus you don't need to worry about losing any tactical advantage...because there isn't one to worry about.
If there was a mechanical tactical advantage to having characters work together, then you'd have the super heroes team walking around acting in perfect sync like some kind of hive mind driven by players looking to maximize the odds of the resolution system (i.e. just like D&D party play). Which is NEVER what we see of real super hero teams in the comics...not in the Fantastic Four, not in the X-Men, clearly not in the Avengers, heck not even in the Justice League.
Far from making the game a better simulation by providing mechanical advantage to teaming up, you make it a WORSE simulation because any such advantage encourages players to have their characters behave in a completely non comic book like fashion.
Does that make sense at all, or am I just babbling...
I just went through the first 2 graphic novels for the Authority, the first 3 for Planetary, the first 2 hardbacks for Ultimate X-Men, Ultimate Spiderman, swaths of classic X-Men, all of Astro City, most of Promethia, the Watchmen, and big chunks of JLA stuff and so on and so on in the last few weeks, and I have to say what I saw mostly stacks up with what Ralph said.
You get lots of teamwork in the sense of "You fight the left, I'll fight the right" and "You take out the sentinels while I take out Magneto" type teamwork. But the fights where every member of the team fights with one goal against a single enemy are fairly rare. They do happen in some of the X-Men stuff (fighting Juggernaught, mostly) -- but even then it tends to go like "Wolverine, you get his helmet off, Cyclopse you get Jean to saftey, Storm you turn the ground to mud so he can't charge." And at that point each of the heroes usually gets a couple of pannels where they are the star baddass, followed by a couple of pannels of bad-ass for the next person in line. They go sequentially, all getting (or not getting) their little part of the goal. In the X-Men its particularly common for this to get messed up because one of the heroes (Wolverine or Gambit being popular ones) get a personal grudge on and go running off to do other things. Similar things happen in the JLA, where Superman often goes to slug it out with the ultimate bad thing, while Batman discovers its weakness, and Flash saves civilians from fires and explosions.
That kind of "group conflict" works pretty well in WGP. Everyone has specific stakes for what they want to do this page, and they just get it so their stakes work together to give the group as a whole what they want. It takes some doing, but if everyone wins their seperate stakes a group of super heroes can really FUBAR a villain in a big way.
The one exception is that sometimes, at the very end of JLA, Justice League, and X-Men comics the heroes will be facing a thing like Galactus and have to all hit him at the same time to take him down. That particular type of teamwork you can do, but as was noted its just a flavor thing -- it doesn't really give any huge advantages, it's just something you can pencil and ink or not if'n you want to.
Quote from: Valamir on June 07, 2006, 04:25:34 PM
You must read different comics than I do.
Only rarely have I seen any where the heroes seem to be working together other than in the vaguest "we're all here at the same time" sense.
In fact, most of the time they look much like kung fu movies where the enemy gang throws themselves into the fray one at a time so they can all get beat up one by one.
Panel: here's hero # 1 shooting a power blast at the villain...there's the villain using some object to reflect the power blast back at hero #1, hero #1 goes flying into a wall.
Panel: here's hero #2 charging in with his super strength...there's the villain hurling hero #2 into the air and out of frame
Pane: here's hero #3 calling on the powers of mystic darkness...there's the villain using his anti magic ray to render hero #3 powerless.
Yes, but my point is they are all trying to achieve the same thing. If the villain is e.g. trying to blow up the city, they want to prevent that. There may be cases where they have different goals, but often, especially if they are an established team, they will be out to do the same thing. Usually to prevent the villain from committing some dastardly deed.
We must indeed read different comics if the ones you read contains combat like this:
Hero #1 fights to capture the villain. Hero #2 fights to impress his girlfriend. Hero #3 fights to protect the city.
Panel: hero #1 shoots another power blast at the villain. The villain, unable to respond, is defeated. Hero #1, having won, is now out of the conflict.
Several panels: heroes #2 and #3 continues the fight. Eventually #2 defeats the villain. Having won, hero #2 is now out of the conflict.
More panels: hero #3 continues to fight. Eventually the villain defeats him.
Result: the villain is captured, hero #2's girlfriend is impressed, and the city blows up.
I can't think of one such example.
Quote from: Brand_Robins on June 07, 2006, 08:20:41 PM
But the fights where every member of the team fights with one goal against a single enemy are fairly rare. They do happen in some of the X-Men stuff (fighting Juggernaught, mostly) -- but even then it tends to go like "Wolverine, you get his helmet off, Cyclopse you get Jean to saftey, Storm you turn the ground to mud so he can't charge."
Those are tactical choices, not stakes. Wolverine is not fighting in order to get Juggernaut's helmet off, he is trying to get his helmet off as a means to win the fight.
Quote from: klausok on June 08, 2006, 01:52:55 PM
Those are tactical choices, not stakes. Wolverine is not fighting in order to get Juggernaut's helmet off, he is trying to get his helmet off as a means to win the fight.
Yes. Sorry, I obviously wasn't clear about that. (Shouldn't post when I just get back from the gym, brain isn't working right.)
What I was going for in that section is that even when folks in comics have linked stakes at the same time they don't usually all do so at the same time or in the same way. They go back and forth between themselves in a series of exchanges, in which each gets a turn to look badass. All you need to do in WGP to get that to work is to ink it in such a way that each hero's win or loss reflects that part of something rather than the whole struggle.
So Wolverine just beat Juggernaut with the stakes "look badass" and then in the next page Storm loses with the stakes "prove my leadership" and in the next Cyclopse wins with the stakes "lets KO Jug-head" -- you end up inking it as Wolveine cutting off his helmet, Storm getting creamed by a fist, and Cyclopse jumping in at the last moment to KO him. Or, if you have Cyclopse win first and then Wolverine win and then Storm lose last, you just wait until everyone's had their go-round before you ink the final conclusion. You can still end up with Wolvering cutting off the helmet, Storm getting punched in the face, and Cyclopse blasting Jugs into a hole. It's even easier in the JLA example, where Superman can KO the bad any time, and Flash can still be left fighting fires and saving civilians for several pannels.
The time where it gets really tricky is where every person says their goal is "beat the crap out of Galactus as a team." Because then it does get a little difficult to ink everything smoothly. In those situations I find that I fudge a little and get people to make stakes like "I do my part of the grand plan to beat Galactus" as their stakes -- that way you may (for example) be succesful in blowing his Ultimate Nulifier out of his hand, but you still don't take him out until everyone has done their part. (And even then if you don't have the right place in the Arc, he isn't staying down.)
This may not work for you, not saying it will. I'm just telling you what works for me because you asked.
Quote from: Brand_Robins on June 08, 2006, 08:03:36 PM
(lil snip)
So Wolverine just beat Juggernaut with the stakes "look badass" and then in the next page Storm loses with the stakes "prove my leadership" and in the next Cyclopse wins with the stakes "lets KO Jug-head" -- you end up inking it as Wolveine cutting off his helmet, Storm getting creamed by a fist, and Cyclopse jumping in at the last moment to KO him. Or, if you have Cyclopse win first and then Wolverine win and then Storm lose last, you just wait until everyone's had their go-round before you ink the final conclusion. You can still end up with Wolvering cutting off the helmet, Storm getting punched in the face, and Cyclopse blasting Jugs into a hole. It's even easier in the JLA example, where Superman can KO the bad any time, and Flash can still be left fighting fires and saving civilians for several pannels.
The time where it gets really tricky is where every person says their goal is "beat the crap out of Galactus as a team." Because then it does get a little difficult to ink everything smoothly. In those situations I find that I fudge a little and get people to make stakes like "I do my part of the grand plan to beat Galactus" as their stakes -- that way you may (for example) be succesful in blowing his Ultimate Nulifier out of his hand, but you still don't take him out until everyone has done their part. (And even then if you don't have the right place in the Arc, he isn't staying down.)
Thanks for posting that. Those ideas should really help me out with my own game. I've not had a problem, yet, but I could see these types of problems occurring with a larger group size and I think this approach will help greatly.
Quote from: Brand_Robins on June 08, 2006, 08:03:36 PM
So Wolverine just beat Juggernaut with the stakes "look badass" and then in the next page Storm loses with the stakes "prove my leadership" and in the next Cyclopse wins with the stakes "lets KO Jug-head" -- you end up inking it as Wolveine cutting off his helmet, Storm getting creamed by a fist, and Cyclopse jumping in at the last moment to KO him. Or, if you have Cyclopse win first and then Wolverine win and then Storm lose last, you just wait until everyone's had their go-round before you ink the final conclusion. You can still end up with Wolvering cutting off the helmet, Storm getting punched in the face, and Cyclopse blasting Jugs into a hole. It's even easier in the JLA example, where Superman can KO the bad any time, and Flash can still be left fighting fires and saving civilians for several pannels.
The problem with that approach is this: what if Cyclops loses? That would look real weird on the comic page.
Three heroes are trying to stop Juggernaut doing some vile deed. First Cyclops is defeated. Then Storm. But then Volverine beats the villain and saves the day! No, wait. It was Cyclops who had the stakes that mattered. Wolverine beating Juggernaut makes no difference. The vile deed is done anyway.
The answer to that, if I understand the philosophy of the game correctly, is that Wolverine looking badass is as important to the story as stopping Juggernaut blowing up the city. It is probably a strife aspect. Otherwise why would Juggernaut bother fighting him? "Wolverine wants to look badass? (Shrugs) Fine by me."
But this is a game about heroes. Not just people with powers, but heroes. No matter how important looking badass is to Wolverine, he would go for saving the city first, and looking badass while doing it second. That is what makes a hero a hero. "People who chose to suffer so that others might be saved", as the rules put it.
Um, who said anything about Juggernaut trying to blow up the city?
Maybe he was trying to make the heroes look like idiots on national TV (being Jugs, by beating them silly). Maybe he was trying to get She-Hulks attention? Maybe he was out picking daisies and the X-Men jumped him so they could bring in a wanted criminal. Maybe a lot of things.
However, if the goal is really "save the city" than it's easy to get around the whole problem of this thread once again -- because many of the heroes won't all be fighting Jugernaut, or if they are will be doing it with the goal of SAVING THE CITY not the goal of beating Juggernaut. Beacause, as you point out, "he would go for saving the city first" -- and that means saving the city before beating up the badguy.
::shrug::
Sorry I couldn't be of more help. I'm honestly not interested in convincing you of anything, so if you haven't found it useful so far, then I think I'll be done now.
Quote from: Brand_Robins on June 12, 2006, 10:38:59 PM
Um, who said anything about Juggernaut trying to blow up the city?
I did. Because that is the situation that gives problems: some dastardly deed that several heroes are trying to stop. No doubt there are lots of other situations the rules handle well. It is the problem areas that need discussing.
Quote
However, if the goal is really "save the city" than it's easy to get around the whole problem of this thread once again -- because many of the heroes won't all be fighting Jugernaut, or if they are will be doing it with the goal of SAVING THE CITY not the goal of beating Juggernaut. Beacause, as you point out, "he would go for saving the city first" -- and that means saving the city before beating up the badguy.
Yes, that is the solution. We will make up some house rule that allows this.
Quote
Sorry I couldn't be of more help. I'm honestly not interested in convincing you of anything, so if you haven't found it useful so far, then I think I'll be done now.
No, it has been most interesting talking with you. Thanks for you time and effort.
Quote from: klausok on June 13, 2006, 01:33:47 PM
Quote from: Brand_Robins on June 12, 2006, 10:38:59 PM
However, if the goal is really "save the city" than it's easy to get around the whole problem of this thread once again -- because many of the heroes won't all be fighting Jugernaut, or if they are will be doing it with the goal of SAVING THE CITY not the goal of beating Juggernaut. Beacause, as you point out, "he would go for saving the city first" -- and that means saving the city before beating up the badguy.
Yes, that is the solution. We will make up some house rule that allows this.
Ok, so, I literally
just finished reading the rules for the first time, and
just registered to the forums, so maybe I'm speaking out of place here - if I am, please let me know. I've never run a WGP... game, nor played in one (though at Dreamation last year I managed to watch the last fifteen minutes of a demo, and yet for some reason was able to be so obsessed with going back upstairs and losing an L5R card tournanment that I refused to stick around and participate in the next demo...) however, I don't think that any sort of "house rule" is necessary here.
The WGP... book specifically gives exampels of team ups where heroes split the bill, so to speak, during a Conflict Scene. Step 2D of the conflict process (page 43 of the pdf, 39 as printed at the bottom of the page itself on the pdf) gives an example of Mudslide vs Debris + Noir, and at the same time Perjury vs The Stalwart (Which isn't a team up, so let's overlook that one for now.)
The GM, Grace, instigates the fight with Debris' player Deanna, claiming his stakes to be "Debris has to exit the scene with Mudslide." Deanna claims her stakes to be "Mudslide leaves the scene with Debris." (Because of the way inking works after a page of conflict resolves, these come out to be very different things, despite the fact that they look like the otherwise.) Nate, Noir's player, suggests making his stakes "I beat up Mudslide," but Gracie, and nearby player Stephen, help pencil in a bit and come up with "If you win, you impress Pearl, your character's sweetheart." Grace then comes up with a second stake, for this seperate page of conflict: "If Mudslide wins, not only does Noir not impress Pearl, but she leaves the scene with Mudslide."
Michael has time and again said - both here and in the book - that due to a sort of conflicting nature of timing, the final inking of a page might be held on until the last page is finished. So, these are 4 stakes that don't conflict, what are the possible outcomes?
1. Mudslide beats Debris. Mudslide beats Noir. - Mudslide fends off the attacks of Noir easily, making him look like a pushover in front of Pearl, then scoops her up in her disapointed state, before knocking Debris out and swallowing the rock-woman up inside his bubbling shape and oozing away.
2. Mudslide beats Debris. Noir beats Mudslide. - This could go any number of ways, but here's one - Seeing Debris in danger, Pearl steps closer, trying to get a better look at the conflict. Suddenly she is taken up by the monster's gooey form, and her screams pierce the night sky. Suddenly, Noir swoops down (On his Tapestry of Night (TM) ) and slaps a roundhouse kick into Mudslide's mallable form. He snags his girl out from his grip, and the two head off to a rooftop, Pearl justifiably impressed. Mudslide, free from distraction, turns his attention onto his other target, and whoops her good.
3. Debris beats Mudslide. Mudslide beats Noir - Debris and Noir do an excellent job at fighting the powerful mud man, but in a last ditch effort, Mudslide slips through the cracks in the ground, into the sewers. Confused, the heroes look around, until suddenly, he appears behind (dun-dun-DUN!) Pearl. He offers Noir a choice - Me or the Girl. He hesitates, Pearl looks hurt, and then looks muddy as she's swallowed up in his massive form. Debris finishes the job in a flash, but they can't seem to get Pearl free. Mudslide is carted off for study.
4. Debris beats Mudslide. Noir beats Mudslide. - This is the easy one - use your own imagination, eh? ;)
Likewise, if you look around this forum you can find Actual Play reports of WGP... that deal very, very much with "A city is in danger and a team helps it" or "one villian attacks 3 heroes." I remember one (that I'm too lazy to find and reference because it's 6:26 AM) where in a bunch of Zombies were overturning busses, setting fires by mistake, etc. Each hero had a different task.
And back to the bit about Juggernaut, if that fight was happening, it's the GMs job to make sure that his or her players' stakes don't overlap, and to help them pencil in ones that work and that are fun. Regarding these stakes - Wolverine: Look badass, Storm: Prove Leadership, Cyclops: KO Jug-head - you say:
QuoteThe problem with that approach is this: what if Cyclops loses? That would look real weird on the comic page.
Not really, and we don't even have to get into the stakes of Jug-head to explan this one:
Cyclops loses but Storm and Wolvie win - Wolverine smirks as the trio sees Juggernaut rampaging through the city. "Hey bub! How about you pick on someone half your size!? 's more fun this way!" He rushes forward and somersaults himselft onto Juggernaut's head, and quickly begins dismantling his headgear. Juggernaut tosses the Canuk against a nearby brick wall, smashing it to bits, but before he can gloat, Weapon X is back on his feat - "Yeah, I hit the brick wall, it shatters all around me leaving me under a deep pile, but I stand up and grin. 'Hey, missin' something?' I say, as open my palm and reveal that Juggernaut's toss gave me the momentum I needed to yank out the last screw on his helmet. Ever so slowly, it falls off. Cyclps grins and sees his oppurtunity, firing off a quick optic blast at Marko's head. The Juggernaut turns and leaps just in time, taking the blast dead on, but in his body instead of his head. He charges forward maniaclly laughing - "NOTHING STOPS THE JUGGERNAUT!" he screams, and blitzes through a few more blasts from Cyclops before catching the Blue Team leader in his hand, and squeezing hard - hard enough to shatter Scott's visor and chuck him aside. When he hits the ground, a blast eviscerates the ground between the the two of them (plus Storm) and Wolverine. Cyclops thinks .oO(I... I can't control them like this. I can't let someone be hurt, not again... What am I going to do!?) Storm's eyes glaze over as she rises into the air - "Be still Scott, I will not let this brute harm the members of this team. Hear me, fogs of the valley, consume us!" A thick mist decends quickly and Jugs can't make out any of his targets. He's still free to wreck what he comes across, but at the very least, Storm has prevented her team from being dismanteled. She hovers down to Scott, guiding him safely through the fog as Juggernaut tosses cars randomly, each missing just by a bit. "Marko! Get it? Like Marco Polo! HAHAHA" says the Juggernaut, who quickly grabs the thought baloon .oO(Maybe I should go back to those improv classes...) The team flees the scene, Cyclops' loss allowing The Juggernaut to damage the scenery quite a bit, but unless his stakes against Cylcops (as that's who he beat) were "Damage the City" none of his damage will last more than the scene. Meanwhile, whatever his other stakes were, they've failed completely too!
*shrug* But, you know, maybe I'm overstepping my bounds? (PS - it's 6:50 now, I should sleep!)
Quote from: Austin Walker on October 22, 2006, 06:52:59 AM
Ok, so, I literally just finished reading the rules for the first time, and just registered to the forums, so maybe I'm speaking out of place here - if I am, please let me know. I've never run a WGP... game, nor played in one (though at Dreamation last year I managed to watch the last fifteen minutes of a demo, and yet for some reason was able to be so obsessed with going back upstairs and losing an L5R card tournanment that I refused to stick around and participate in the next demo...)
Don't worry about being out of place. I had not yet played the game when I asked this question. As you may have seen in another thread, I have now played part of a game. It doesn't look like I will get to play again. A pity. WGP is interesting.
Please note that I am not saying that there are no situations this game handles well. My opinion is that it handles many situations well. But there is one situation that it does not handle at all, and that is one that is crucial to team superhero stories. The villain is about to do some villainous deed, and the heroes try to stop him. As an example, I took a villain trying to blow up the city. Somebody chose Juggernaut, a character I don't know, so I don't know if it is appropriate. J picks a fight against Cyclops, choosing as his stake: "the city blows up". Cyclops has brought a few friends. My question is: how can they help him? It seems that they can't.
Quote from: Austin Walker on October 22, 2006, 06:52:59 AM
And back to the bit about Juggernaut, if that fight was happening, it's the GMs job to make sure that his or her players' stakes don't overlap, and to help them pencil in ones that work and that are fun. Regarding these stakes - Wolverine: Look badass, Storm: Prove Leadership, Cyclops: KO Jug-head - you say:
QuoteThe problem with that approach is this: what if Cyclops loses? That would look real weird on the comic page.
Not really, and we don't even have to get into the stakes of Jug-head to explan this one:
Cyclops loses but Storm and Wolvie win - Wolverine smirks as the trio sees Juggernaut rampaging through the city. "Hey bub! How about you pick on someone half your size!? 's more fun this way!" He rushes forward and somersaults himselft onto Juggernaut's head, and quickly begins dismantling his headgear. Juggernaut tosses the Canuk against a nearby brick wall, smashing it to bits, but before he can gloat, Weapon X is back on his feat - "Yeah, I hit the brick wall, it shatters all around me leaving me under a deep pile, but I stand up and grin. 'Hey, missin' something?' I say, as open my palm and reveal that Juggernaut's toss gave me the momentum I needed to yank out the last screw on his helmet. Ever so slowly, it falls off. Cyclps grins and sees his oppurtunity, firing off a quick optic blast at Marko's head. The Juggernaut turns and leaps just in time, taking the blast dead on, but in his body instead of his head. He charges forward maniaclly laughing - "NOTHING STOPS THE JUGGERNAUT!" he screams, and blitzes through a few more blasts from Cyclops before catching the Blue Team leader in his hand, and squeezing hard - hard enough to shatter Scott's visor and chuck him aside. When he hits the ground, a blast eviscerates the ground between the the two of them (plus Storm) and Wolverine. Cyclops thinks .oO(I... I can't control them like this. I can't let someone be hurt, not again... What am I going to do!?) Storm's eyes glaze over as she rises into the air - "Be still Scott, I will not let this brute harm the members of this team. Hear me, fogs of the valley, consume us!" A thick mist decends quickly and Jugs can't make out any of his targets. He's still free to wreck what he comes across, but at the very least, Storm has prevented her team from being dismanteled. She hovers down to Scott, guiding him safely through the fog as Juggernaut tosses cars randomly, each missing just by a bit. "Marko! Get it? Like Marco Polo! HAHAHA" says the Juggernaut, who quickly grabs the thought baloon .oO(Maybe I should go back to those improv classes...) The team flees the scene, Cyclops' loss allowing The Juggernaut to damage the scenery quite a bit, but unless his stakes against Cylcops (as that's who he beat) were "Damage the City" none of his damage will last more than the scene. Meanwhile, whatever his other stakes were, they've failed completely too!
Yes, that might happen in a comic book. But it rubs me the wrong way for several reasons:
1) the players won two out of three fights, yet the net result is a resounding defeat. The city blew up, which was what they were out to prevent. Wolverine's victory mattered not at all, while Storm's turned an unmitigated disaster into an ever so slightly mitigated one. You might say that this is a gamist argument that has no place in this game. But logically it should be enough that one hero win. In the comic books you often see the heroes defeated one by one, until the last one standing saves the day. Here you need to pick the one to save the day ahead of time.
2) The reason the two heroes' victories make no difference is that they chose stupid and unheroic stakes. I am not saying that that could not happen. Maybe looking badass is so important to Wolverine that he would choose that over saving the city. What I don't like is that the rules force him to make that choice. No, it does not force him to choose "I look badass". He can choose any other unheroic stake. But he can not choose "save the city", for Cyclops is already doing that. He should have the option of being heroic, of saying "I will save this city even if I must look like a wimp to do so". The rules deny him that option. And he can't very well stake something like "no person dies from the explosion" since there will be no explosion if Cyclops wins.
You may say that the GM should choose other stakes for villain. But I don't really see what they could be. "If I defeat Cyclops the central district blows up, if I defeat Storm the port goes, ..." seems very artificial to me. And there are other often used dastardly deeds which you can not split up like that.
Note that it makes no difference if Cyclops picks the fight and stakes "saving the city".
The villainous deed that
must be stopped, making everything else secondary, is a staple of the superhero genre. So is the super team cooperating to stop it. I consider it a serious flaw in a superhero game if it can not handle this.
Ok, how about this?
1) If the villain can yeild to one hero to concentrate on another, your stakes must not have been very compelling.
2) If somebody winning a page of conflict makes somebody else's stakes invalid, so be it. This keeps the villain fighting everybody, because yeilding to anybody means he loses, but once he's defeated even one hero, he wins his stakes, and the other heroes can't take that away from him. Similarly, if even one hero defeats him, he can't win his stakes. Either way, the "invalidated" side can still keep fighting, if only to keep the remaining opponents from winning their stakes.
I'm not really sure how often this would be a problem though. The villain can only pick one fight at a time, and the heroes who pick fights with the villain can't really say what he can't do. All they can say is, "This is what I get if I win". Getting that will, by default, stop the villain from getting his stakes for that page, but the villain would be stupid to choose the same stakes as he's fighting for on another page. Plus it's important to remember not to set your stakes too specifically. "I cause great damage to the city" is a better stake than "I blow up the city". That way, you can still win your stakes without counting on the city being Devastated. It also allows you to apportion your victories. Yes, Cyclops lost, so part of the city was destroyed, but thanks to the valor of Wolverine and Storm, much of the city was saved.
I think that works.