*
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 05, 2014, 10:55:17 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Forum changes: Editing of posts has been turned off until further notice.
Search:     Advanced search
275647 Posts in 27717 Topics by 4283 Members Latest Member: - otto Most online today: 55 - most online ever: 429 (November 03, 2007, 04:35:43 AM)
Pages: [1] 2
Print
Author Topic: Definition of "Porn"  (Read 4305 times)
sirogit
Member

Posts: 503


« on: April 08, 2005, 02:46:54 AM »

I noticed Ron Edwards mentioning this in the Sin City thread, and I was wondering if most people's definitions synced up to mine, which is, anything in a story-medium which exists only to present that thing, with such subdivisions as "Car porn" "Gun porn" "Violence porn" "Martial Arts porn" and of course, plain old "porn". Much like plain old porn, those sub-types typically feature heavy fetishization, and a little to no resemblance to the reality of the thing in question.

I always looked at the setting of D&D as "fantasy porn", that is, its an exploration of various tropes that are tied to fantasy through the loosest threads, catagorized in such a way (Alignment, Levels, Spell-like abilities) that makes them function in the narrative completely alien from their original design.
Logged
Vaxalon
Member

Posts: 1619


« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2005, 03:13:04 AM »

Given that definition of porn, yeah, that pretty much sums it up.
Logged

"In our game the other night, Joshua's character came in as an improvised thing, but he was crap so he only contributed a d4!"
                                     --Vincent Baker
James Holloway
Member

Posts: 372


« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2005, 03:19:42 AM »

My old high school theater teacher used the same definition: "pornography" was any creative work in which story, characters, etc. existed solely to deliver some other payload, whether actual sex, fight scenes, explosions, sweeping landscape vistas...

I'm not sure that D&D could be considered "fantasy porn," though. Taken as a whole, it seems too ... various ... for that.
Logged
Christopher Weeks
Member

Posts: 683


« Reply #3 on: April 08, 2005, 03:29:37 AM »

I've not thought of the definition outside of Porn -- sex.  But, especially given this broader sense of porn, is the word still pejorative?  If so, why?  All those pornographies sound groovy to me, if well done.
Logged
James Holloway
Member

Posts: 372


« Reply #4 on: April 08, 2005, 03:35:34 AM »

Quote from: Christopher Weeks
I've not thought of the definition outside of Porn -- sex.  But, especially given this broader sense of porn, is the word still pejorative?  If so, why?  All those pornographies sound groovy to me, if well done.

Well, regular pornography is cool if what you want is images of people being naked and having sex.

And yet it is mildly pejorative -- we distinguish pornography from "real art" or whatever. It all depends on your expectations.
Logged
pete_darby
Member

Posts: 537

Will dance with porridge down pants for food.


WWW
« Reply #5 on: April 08, 2005, 04:15:46 AM »

Well, yeah, it's all well and good for it's purpose, but eventually, you want to get out and do it for real, instead of this stuff all around it, you want to care about the folks involved, because you know that'll make it better.

And then you do, and you find it a lot deeper and more satidfying and, yes, more complicated and more dangerous in it's own way...

But that's enough about D&D in relation to FRP, what about sexporn and erotica?
Logged

Pete Darby
Ben Lehman
Member

Posts: 2094

Blissed


WWW
« Reply #6 on: April 08, 2005, 04:30:35 AM »

Can I call some threads "Forge porn" then?

yrs--
--Ben
Logged

pete_darby
Member

Posts: 537

Will dance with porridge down pants for food.


WWW
« Reply #7 on: April 08, 2005, 04:51:24 AM »

Quote from: Ben Lehman
Can I call some threads "Forge porn" then?

yrs--
--Ben


Links! We demand links!

Or not, since that would be needlessly personal...

(PM me with links!)
Logged

Pete Darby
Larry L.
Member

Posts: 616

aka Miskatonic


« Reply #8 on: April 08, 2005, 05:54:54 AM »

I know I've taken to referring to certain "lifestyle" magazines as "consumer porn."
Logged

Ron Edwards
Global Moderator
Member
*
Posts: 16490


WWW
« Reply #9 on: April 08, 2005, 06:00:38 AM »

Hello,

Sirogit, that pretty much corresponds to the definition that Seth and I discussed privately a while ago. Pornography, to me, is not sex-specific; rather, sexual pornography is merely a sub-type.

Or if you wanted to look at it another way, sex (depiction, description, etc), can be utilized in media in a number of ways, one of which is pornographic. Substitute practically anything you want for "sex" and the same will apply.

I wrote a magazine article for a few bucks a while ago about martial arts pornography in a lot of 80s-ish movies, and I don't think it's unreasonable to consider a lot of network news broadcasting to be "gossip porn." I'm not using the term, in these cases, as any sort of analogy or ironic reference or anything like that - it's a literal description of how the stuff is presented and what's happening with the viewer.

Best,
Ron
Logged
Brendan
Member

Posts: 144


WWW
« Reply #10 on: April 08, 2005, 06:04:59 AM »

por nog' ra phy' (n):  "We'll know it when we see it."

--The Supreme Court of the United States of America
Logged
Meguey
Member

Posts: 250

Meguey


WWW
« Reply #11 on: April 08, 2005, 09:21:50 AM »

I think some of the stuff you (collective) have been describing is more like erotica than porn, given the definitions of erotica:

Erotica: [Sexually] arousing material that is not degrading to men, women, or children. (Janet S Hyde, Understanding Human Sexuality, Whitehall, Ohio, McGraw 1990)

Erotica: [Sexually] oriented media that are considered by a viewer or a society as within the acceptable bounds of decency. (Janell Carroll & Paul R Wolpe, Sexuality and Gender in Society, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley 1996)

My brackets  added, to see if it works to pop in 'martial arts', 'computer', 'consumer', etc.

Ok, I do think the "gossip porn" is porn (i.e. It's degrading to men, women, and/or children.)
Logged
Vaxalon
Member

Posts: 1619


« Reply #12 on: April 08, 2005, 09:26:52 AM »

Is Dungeons and Dragons degrading to Fantasy?
Logged

"In our game the other night, Joshua's character came in as an improvised thing, but he was crap so he only contributed a d4!"
                                     --Vincent Baker
Brendan
Member

Posts: 144


WWW
« Reply #13 on: April 08, 2005, 10:35:55 AM »

Hmm.  Bad (or average) D&D play is.  So are a lot of D&D players.  As for the system / setting itself, that's tricky.
Logged
Adam Dray
Member

Posts: 676


WWW
« Reply #14 on: April 08, 2005, 12:00:19 PM »

Quote from: Brendan
por nog' ra phy' (n):  "We'll know it when we see it."

--The Supreme Court of the United States of America


Actually, that was their reaction to obscenity, not pornography.
Logged

Adam Dray / adam@legendary.org
Verge -- cyberpunk role-playing on the brink
FoundryMUSH - indie chat and play at foundry.legendary.org 7777
Pages: [1] 2
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Oxygen design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!